South Park Goes Where SNL Refuses

by Alexander Marlow

Tonight is one of the best nights of the year: The premiere of the 13th season of “South Park.”  I consider myself one of America’s foremost “South Park” scholars and if I had to sum up the reason I love the show, it would be this: it spares no one.  Take last season’s “About Last Night…” episode about Obama’s electoral victory–Obama, Palin, McCain, McCain supporters, and Obamaites are all evenly trashed.  In South Park, satire trumps politics.  Since 1997, “South Park” has been America’s safest bet for the splendid fusion of irreverence and insight.

They took up that mantle from “Saturday Night Live,” which now offers us neither.

While Wednesday has been “South Park” night for as long as I can remember, last Saturday night was spent in the usual way: not watching SNL.  Unfortunately, due to the internet, I happened to view a smattering of last week’s show:


Do you remember how they terrorized George W. Bush?  Or how they tried to make a bozo out of Sarah Palin?  And this is what the chickens over at NBC have to offer us now?  How pathetic.  How inconsequential. How unfunny.  “The Rock Obama?”  This is a cutesy joke too juvenile for Little Leaguers.

The alternative media has correctly observed SNL fails to cultivate humor around President Obama.  Big Hollywood’s own sketch comic, Steven Crowder, wrote a letter to Executive Producer Lorne Michaels saying as much just last week.

Perhaps the problem is with the man who plays the sitting President, Fred Armisen.  If you’ve watched any of his sketches, you know Fred Armisen is about as funny as a screening of “Sophie’s Choice,” but that doesn’t mean the writers can’t pick up the slack.  Armisen, even donning mulatoface, isn’t enough to sink the mighty SNL ship.  The problem with the Obama sketches is the skewed political agenda driving the writing staff.  I submit to you the last 30 seconds of this clip as evidence.

The premise of the sketch tries to answer this simple question: “What would happen if Obama got angry?”

We get our answer during the dream sequence:  Obama doesn’t get angry.

It’s as brave as it is funny.

The first four minutes were almost as fawning, as an angry Obama becomes a superhero who throws Republicans out windows (brought to you by the people who declared dissent “patriotic”).  In the end, the joke is on “Rahmbo” Emanuel and his bad temper and the audience is left with a warm, fuzzy reminder that Obama is awesome — head and shoulders above everyone else in Washington.  Good times!

If SNL intends for us to believe there’s nothing humorous about our President, they’re delusional.  Ignoring any scandals and political decisions he has made, can we at least see a sketch about the Teleprompter?  If George W. Bush had been as dependent on his Teleprompter, wouldn’t he have been mocked unmercifully as a puppet of the “Cheney/Rove Cabal?”  And yet, Obama is still regarded as the greatest orator of our time.  Obama is a fount of humor yet untapped.  Despite his shortcomings (and all Presidents have shortcomings), SNL can proffer only Rahm Emanuel’s irrelevant “The Rock Obama” wet dream.

So far Obama-era SNL lacks irreverence and insight, but worst of all, it lacks humor. To put it mildly, it stinks.

Can’t wait for the “South Park” premiere.