Honoring September 11th: The Restart of History
by Andrew Leigh“Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in!” – Michael Corleone, Godfather Part III
True story: As a young man just out of law school, I was consumed with politics. I even went to work on the Hill (Capitol, that is, Washington, DC) and in journalism. But at some point in the ’90s, my interest faded away.
Francis Fukuyama wrote a then-notorious book called The End of History, published in 1992, shortly after the Soviet Union’s collapse. He argued that the age-old ideological struggles over what constitutes the best form of government were over, and the undisputed universal champion was Western liberal (in the classic, free-market sense) democracy.
I grew up during the latter stages of the Cold War, when the existential threat of nuclear war hung over and colored almost everything. It made politics seem vital to one’s very survival. And I found the debate between capitalism and communism hugely compelling.
After the fall of the Soviet Union and the (apparently) decisive victory of free markets over collectivism, politics lost its import and thus its grip on my attention. But I didn’t miss it at all. I was perfectly content to retreat to the status of a casual spectator, and to focus on more aesthetic matters. I wrote screenplays instead of news commentary, gladly.
But Fukuyama and I were wrong. 9/11 proved it.
On that fateful morning, my phone rang a little after 6 AM. A friend who’d recently moved to Boston insisted that I turn on the TV, despite the early hour. The second plane had just hit the second tower. And we were at war with a strange new foe. (Which turned out to be an age-old foe, but I didn’t know it at the time.)
As for many others, my world changed that day. I was dragged back, kicking and screaming, into the maelstrom of politics. History had risen from the dead.
I knew the Internet well, but I’d largely avoided political websites. That changed on 9/11. I studied topics I wish I never needed to know about. I got involved again.
I discovered another book that emerged in the ’90s, in part as a response to Fukuyama’s thesis. It was called The Clash of Civilizations, by Samuel Huntington. He agreed that the age of ideology was over, but argued that fault lines over culture and religion would deepen and become a greater source of conflict. And he believed one of the principal fault lines of conflict would lie between Muslim and non-Muslim civilizations.
Huntington was remarkably prescient. But I would add this: I don’t think the struggle over ideology is over.
The collectivists are by no means through. As wrong as they are, their message is too seductive to die forever. They will always be around, in one form or another. And I see them now joining forces, dangerously, with some of the West’s cultural adversaries.
History will never end. We were fools ever to think so. One evil perishes; another rises in its place. That’s what 9/11 taught me.
One of my artistic heroes is J.R.R. Tolkien, whom I believe has much to say, albeit obliquely, about our present state. I close with a quote from one of his letters that I oddly find somehow comforting:
“Actually, I am a Christian, and indeed a Roman Catholic, so that I do not expect ‘history’ to be anything but a ‘long defeat’ – though it contains (and in a legend may contain more clearly and movingly) some samples or glimpses of final victory.”







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
15 Comments
And coinsidentally the Country song "Have you forgotten" by Daryll Worely is playing on the radio as I read this.
And coincidentally the Country song "Have you forgotten" by Daryll Worely is playing on the radio as I read this.
The clash of civilazations is going to continue until there is not one left… because if it's not one religion or culture versus another, it's the lack of religion and/or anti-culture vs religion/culture.
The ideological battle is alive and well – and Barack Obama, finding the imagry and message of 9/11 inconvenient to his side of that battle, is moving to 'make it go away'.
Fukuyama did not mean history was ended; he only meant that the argument on how best to organize society for progress was settled.
Andrew, nice post. I agree with you. You might want to check out the novel The Earth Mosaic. It is a story partly about the unholy alliance you mention in your post– about how various collectivists combine forces with radical Muslims. It is a pretty interesting read.
Sure the argument was over, but nobody on the losing side wanted to admit it.
Unfortunately, like the villain in a slasher flick, the statist collectivists weren't as finished as we thought.
And they've made alliance with the Islamist barbarians.
And now they're BAAAAACK, and in control of the reins.
Cgntv Dssdnt: Not sure why you're bringing up Glenn Beck here. Maybe you meant to post this in the open thread?
But I'll bite. I wonder if Mr. Poniewozik called out MSNBC, Air America, Daily Kos, MoveOn.Org, anti-war marchers, and countless leftists who equated Bush with Hitler, called him a racist (remember "Bush hates black people"?), hyperbolically accused him of "shredding the Constitution" (I wish somebody would shred that cliche), called for impeachment and war trials, etc., etc., etc.?
The civility bar is too low, I agree. But let's not forget who lowered that bar so much during the last administration.
And now back to the actual points raised by the original post….
Mr. Leigh: For real prescience, you may want to check out another of Britain's Roman Catholics, Hillaire Belloc who wrote in the mid 1930's that Islam would by the end of the 20th century be resurgent and posing yet another threat to the West (ala Constantinople, Malta, Lepanto and September 11-12, 1683 at the gates of Vienna). In fact I think Belloc would not be surprised by the date the 19 of Air Jihad chose.
Belloc saw Islam as yet another heresy of Christianity. I choose to call it a socio-political ideology masquerading as an Abrahamic religion.
Avanti, what do you think is the importance of the date?
Looking on Wikipedia, I turned up these options:
1297: Battle of Stirling Bridge (William Wallace)
1609: expulsion order issued in Spain against Moriscos (Islamic Moors posing as Christians)
1609: Henry Hudson discovers Manhattan (ironic, eh?)
1683: King of Poland, John Sobieski, arrives to save the day at the Battle of Vienna, defeating Ottoman forces
1697: Battle of Zenta: Ottoman Empire suffers one of its worst defeats against the Hapsburgs
1941: Ground is broken for construction of the Pentagon
1978: Jimmy Carter, Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin meet at Camp David and agree on Camp David Accords
Fascinating possibilities. My money is on the Battle of Vienna, since that is considered the high-water mark of Islamist efforts to conquer Europe.
Okay, I vaguely sorta agree AND disagree with you there. Glenn calling O' a racist…. so over it. I think it comes with the presidency. Remember how GW doesn't like black people. Kanye should get a Pulitzer for his investigative journalism on that one.
Glenn Beck is interesting television and he does seem to throw out a lot of stuff that may be exaggeration on perceived connections between people. To me, the stuff feels a little too much like the logic that "truthers" like to use. HOWEVER, He does raise some interesting questions that we should be asking. And this ACORN stuff is nasty and worth stamping out.
But the real question… and the heart of the matter. Why the hell did you decide to bring this up? Glenn's really getting under your skin huh?
Andrew… remarkably well written post!
I really wonder Bush really nipped the Islamo-fascism/terror problem in the bud. The folks in Israel still live and deal with the problem. But in America, it doesn't touch most people's lives. The terror threat level means nothing and we just have to learn not to carry water bottles through airport security.
As much as the left hates to admit it, Bush pushed war to their turf and off our shores. And the enemy seems to be feeble and weak. Still, Complacency is scary – and we all learned that on 9/11.
I guess what I'm wondering is – is this "clash of civilizations" really as grandiose as Osama would have like it?
++ I forgotten the issues they have in Europe which is really a bigger front in this clash…
Yes, the Catholic forces under King Jan of Poland saved not only Vienna but Western Europe on that date; actually the victory would not come until September 12th but the battle began on the 11th. When you think in centuries instead of in microwave minutes, those kind of defeats for the team of Mo still smarts.
You must be logged in to post a comment.