<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Holden &amp; BCS Madness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aleigh/2009/01/08/bill-holden-bcs-madness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aleigh/2009/01/08/bill-holden-bcs-madness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:14:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Big Hollywood &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big Thanks: A Really Big Launch, A Really Big Tent, A Really Big Future</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aleigh/2009/01/08/bill-holden-bcs-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-26761</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Hollywood &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big Thanks: A Really Big Launch, A Really Big Tent, A Really Big Future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=12029#comment-26761</guid>
		<description>[...] like Jamie Kirchick (Azerbaijan), Michael van der Galien (Azerbaijan), Scott Johnson (Israel), Andrew Leigh (the Starbucks at the corner of San Vicente and Barrington) and Ace of Spades (numerous bars) also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like Jamie Kirchick (Azerbaijan), Michael van der Galien (Azerbaijan), Scott Johnson (Israel), Andrew Leigh (the Starbucks at the corner of San Vicente and Barrington) and Ace of Spades (numerous bars) also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAW</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aleigh/2009/01/08/bill-holden-bcs-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-22613</link>
		<dc:creator>MAW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=12029#comment-22613</guid>
		<description>I am a huge college football fan in the Upper Midwest and here is my take.

The BCS is broken and should be eliminated or fixed.  I watched all of the &quot;BCS Bowls&quot; and the common denominator was either one or two of the teams was either rusty, flat or both.  The Sugar Bowl was the best game.  The Fiesta Bowl was good but not great.  Same with the National Championship game last night.  The Rose and Orange both were iffy. Therein lies my question, &quot;How can a team(s) be sharp with anywhere from 4 to 6 weeks from its last game?&quot;  Some kind of playoff is needed in addition to some continuity from the last game to get the best and highest quality football.

Utah and USC impressed me the most in this bowl season (and I hate USC).  Utah looked very SEC like in handling Alabama.  USC&#039;s receivers destroyed Penn State.  I don&#039;t know about anyone else but it would sure be interesting to see the height of the USC receivers vs. the speed of the Florida secondary.   

Ed, you are on the right track but why not take the top 16 teams as rated in the polls.  Or, the champions of the &quot;BCS&quot; conferences plus the top ten teams as rated in a &quot;non champions&quot; poll.  The first round would be played at the home stadiums of the higher seeds. The quarterfinals, semifinals and final would then be played at the major bowls.  Any teams that had good seasons but not qualified for the playoff would fill in the other bowls.  I like your idea of shortening the regular season to accommodate a playoff because there are too many Florida vs. The Citadel type match-ups in a season.  No disrespect to the great institution of The Citadel, however, its football team does not belong on the same field as the Florida Gators. 

Ultimately though we have to get away from a system where a computer decides which two 11-1 teams out of eight will play each other in a National Championship game four weeks after they have played their last games.  It should be decided on the field and through a playoff type system.  It would be nice on New Years Day to see a doubleheader that consists of two semifinal games with true meaning.  Stadiums would be full and TV ratings through the roof.

Finally, I believe to get a playoff implemented the current cast of characters has to be changed.  The college presidents, conference commissioners, athletic directors and the football coaches are the biggest obstacles to a playoff system.  An independent &quot;commission&quot; with input from the conference commissioners, athletic directors and football coaches would probably be the only way to get something done.  Thats the hard part.

I am a Wisconsin fan and the Badgers had no business being in a bowl game this year as no 7-5 or 6-6 team should.  The Big Ten was down with a 1-5 record in the bowls.  I believe the Big Ten has some catching up to do to compare to the SEC.  A start would be splitting the 11 teams into two divisions and having a Big Ten Championship Game.

Just some thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a huge college football fan in the Upper Midwest and here is my take.</p>
<p>The BCS is broken and should be eliminated or fixed.  I watched all of the &#8220;BCS Bowls&#8221; and the common denominator was either one or two of the teams was either rusty, flat or both.  The Sugar Bowl was the best game.  The Fiesta Bowl was good but not great.  Same with the National Championship game last night.  The Rose and Orange both were iffy. Therein lies my question, &#8220;How can a team(s) be sharp with anywhere from 4 to 6 weeks from its last game?&#8221;  Some kind of playoff is needed in addition to some continuity from the last game to get the best and highest quality football.</p>
<p>Utah and USC impressed me the most in this bowl season (and I hate USC).  Utah looked very SEC like in handling Alabama.  USC&#8217;s receivers destroyed Penn State.  I don&#8217;t know about anyone else but it would sure be interesting to see the height of the USC receivers vs. the speed of the Florida secondary.   </p>
<p>Ed, you are on the right track but why not take the top 16 teams as rated in the polls.  Or, the champions of the &#8220;BCS&#8221; conferences plus the top ten teams as rated in a &#8220;non champions&#8221; poll.  The first round would be played at the home stadiums of the higher seeds. The quarterfinals, semifinals and final would then be played at the major bowls.  Any teams that had good seasons but not qualified for the playoff would fill in the other bowls.  I like your idea of shortening the regular season to accommodate a playoff because there are too many Florida vs. The Citadel type match-ups in a season.  No disrespect to the great institution of The Citadel, however, its football team does not belong on the same field as the Florida Gators. </p>
<p>Ultimately though we have to get away from a system where a computer decides which two 11-1 teams out of eight will play each other in a National Championship game four weeks after they have played their last games.  It should be decided on the field and through a playoff type system.  It would be nice on New Years Day to see a doubleheader that consists of two semifinal games with true meaning.  Stadiums would be full and TV ratings through the roof.</p>
<p>Finally, I believe to get a playoff implemented the current cast of characters has to be changed.  The college presidents, conference commissioners, athletic directors and the football coaches are the biggest obstacles to a playoff system.  An independent &#8220;commission&#8221; with input from the conference commissioners, athletic directors and football coaches would probably be the only way to get something done.  Thats the hard part.</p>
<p>I am a Wisconsin fan and the Badgers had no business being in a bowl game this year as no 7-5 or 6-6 team should.  The Big Ten was down with a 1-5 record in the bowls.  I believe the Big Ten has some catching up to do to compare to the SEC.  A start would be splitting the 11 teams into two divisions and having a Big Ten Championship Game.</p>
<p>Just some thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aleigh/2009/01/08/bill-holden-bcs-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-20877</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=12029#comment-20877</guid>
		<description>A 16-team playoff would work.  First, restrict the number of regular season games to 11.

There are 12 major conferences.  Each conference should be organized like the SEC (notice the number of SEC teams winning national champtionships ... gee, wonder if conference structure has anything to do with it?).  This means there is a conference championship game at the end of the regular season.  The conference champion goes into the Sweet 16.

There are 4 at large that could be filled by the teams ranked in the AP/BSC/USA-Coaches top 16 but weren&#039;t conference champions.  (Oh - and to appease the NCAA nitwits, maybe reserve one spot for Notre Dame if they merely get 6 wins.)

Thus you get your 16 teams.  All others go into normal bowl games, so they get a 12th game.  Playoff teams end up with between 13 and 15 games, which is only 1 more than what UF and others had this year.

There!  Problem solved.  The NCAA can name the championship game after me for solving their dilemma - The National Championship Ed Bowl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 16-team playoff would work.  First, restrict the number of regular season games to 11.</p>
<p>There are 12 major conferences.  Each conference should be organized like the SEC (notice the number of SEC teams winning national champtionships &#8230; gee, wonder if conference structure has anything to do with it?).  This means there is a conference championship game at the end of the regular season.  The conference champion goes into the Sweet 16.</p>
<p>There are 4 at large that could be filled by the teams ranked in the AP/BSC/USA-Coaches top 16 but weren&#8217;t conference champions.  (Oh &#8211; and to appease the NCAA nitwits, maybe reserve one spot for Notre Dame if they merely get 6 wins.)</p>
<p>Thus you get your 16 teams.  All others go into normal bowl games, so they get a 12th game.  Playoff teams end up with between 13 and 15 games, which is only 1 more than what UF and others had this year.</p>
<p>There!  Problem solved.  The NCAA can name the championship game after me for solving their dilemma &#8211; The National Championship Ed Bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aleigh/2009/01/08/bill-holden-bcs-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-19777</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=12029#comment-19777</guid>
		<description>John the Libertarian,

EPorvaznik is right.  USC didn&#039;t let up, and if fact all the announcers stated they wouldn&#039;t because they never do.  Penn State just played much better and didn&#039;t make as many mistakes the second half.  The first half was the worst they played all year in terms of mental mistakes and unforced errors.

But he&#039;s also right that a loss is a loss and USC won that game outright, exploiting some serious weaknesses in Penn States pass coverage.  I just wouldn&#039;t call it a &quot;crush&quot;ing loss.  

I agree with you that going 5-0 in bowl games is a big statement.  Just like the Big 10&#039;s record in bowls games is an indictment against that division.

But on to the topic of the article, playoff system - YES!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John the Libertarian,</p>
<p>EPorvaznik is right.  USC didn&#8217;t let up, and if fact all the announcers stated they wouldn&#8217;t because they never do.  Penn State just played much better and didn&#8217;t make as many mistakes the second half.  The first half was the worst they played all year in terms of mental mistakes and unforced errors.</p>
<p>But he&#8217;s also right that a loss is a loss and USC won that game outright, exploiting some serious weaknesses in Penn States pass coverage.  I just wouldn&#8217;t call it a &#8220;crush&#8221;ing loss.  </p>
<p>I agree with you that going 5-0 in bowl games is a big statement.  Just like the Big 10&#8217;s record in bowls games is an indictment against that division.</p>
<p>But on to the topic of the article, playoff system &#8211; YES!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zsuzsa</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aleigh/2009/01/08/bill-holden-bcs-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-19097</link>
		<dc:creator>Zsuzsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=12029#comment-19097</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to say something controversial here. Probably the most controversial thing that&#039;s going to be said on this site: I don&#039;t actually want a playoff. I know every college football fan is supposed to hate the BCS and long for an 8 team playoff (which will almost always leave undefeated teams like Utah and Boise State out in the cold, incidentally, anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves), but I don&#039;t.

Tell me, at what point was it decided that a single-elimination tournament was the only possible way to determine the best team? Single-elimination tournaments are far too dependent on luck, especially when the elimination condition is a single game rather than a series. So I applaud college football for being the only sport with the courage to think outside the box.

That being said, the BCS is clearly broken. It obviously got things wrong this year (Utah was 1, then Florida, USC, Texas, Oklahoma). I have some ideas on what would fix it, the two big ones being first to schedule some better out of conference games, and the second to make the championship non-binding. We get an ambiguous answer, but so what? Embrace the doubt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to say something controversial here. Probably the most controversial thing that&#8217;s going to be said on this site: I don&#8217;t actually want a playoff. I know every college football fan is supposed to hate the BCS and long for an 8 team playoff (which will almost always leave undefeated teams like Utah and Boise State out in the cold, incidentally, anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves), but I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Tell me, at what point was it decided that a single-elimination tournament was the only possible way to determine the best team? Single-elimination tournaments are far too dependent on luck, especially when the elimination condition is a single game rather than a series. So I applaud college football for being the only sport with the courage to think outside the box.</p>
<p>That being said, the BCS is clearly broken. It obviously got things wrong this year (Utah was 1, then Florida, USC, Texas, Oklahoma). I have some ideas on what would fix it, the two big ones being first to schedule some better out of conference games, and the second to make the championship non-binding. We get an ambiguous answer, but so what? Embrace the doubt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPTXHornfan</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aleigh/2009/01/08/bill-holden-bcs-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-18917</link>
		<dc:creator>CPTXHornfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=12029#comment-18917</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; The BCS system does not serve its fans well.

 The BCS wasn&#039;t built for the fans, silly. It was built *solely* to make some folks (and companies) extremely rich. Sadly, it is doing that so it won&#039;t be going anywhere anytime soon.

 BTW....Texas fan here. Disgusted....but not enough to throw a fit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; The BCS system does not serve its fans well.</p>
<p> The BCS wasn&#8217;t built for the fans, silly. It was built *solely* to make some folks (and companies) extremely rich. Sadly, it is doing that so it won&#8217;t be going anywhere anytime soon.</p>
<p> BTW&#8230;.Texas fan here. Disgusted&#8230;.but not enough to throw a fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPorvaznik</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aleigh/2009/01/08/bill-holden-bcs-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-18305</link>
		<dc:creator>EPorvaznik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=12029#comment-18305</guid>
		<description>&quot;Allowed.&quot; Yeah, with the starters USC (smartly) played the whole game, OK. A loss is a loss, but Penn State&#039;s implosion in the 2nd quarter didn&#039;t help USC at all, huh? All right, all focus now on next season and hoping Penn State doesn&#039;t lose Maybin to the NFL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Allowed.&#8221; Yeah, with the starters USC (smartly) played the whole game, OK. A loss is a loss, but Penn State&#8217;s implosion in the 2nd quarter didn&#8217;t help USC at all, huh? All right, all focus now on next season and hoping Penn State doesn&#8217;t lose Maybin to the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aleigh/2009/01/08/bill-holden-bcs-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-17789</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=12029#comment-17789</guid>
		<description>&quot;paper tiger SEC&quot;  You must be joking.

Much has been mentioned elsewhere about the PAC-10 going 5-0 in the bowls this year.  Sorry, the SEC had 6 victories, finishing 6-2 - the most representation of any conference.  So Alabama doesn&#039;t show up in their bowl game against Utah.  Makes sense.  They had no chance of winning the national title, but Utah did ... so they out-played &#039;Bama.

Then South Carolina lost.  So 2 SEC teams but it still has more bowl victories than the PAC-10.  And what&#039;s that number again ... 3 national title won by SEC teams in the last 3 years.  How many we won by the PAC-10 in the last 3 years?  Oh yeah.  None.

Paper tiger, indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;paper tiger SEC&#8221;  You must be joking.</p>
<p>Much has been mentioned elsewhere about the PAC-10 going 5-0 in the bowls this year.  Sorry, the SEC had 6 victories, finishing 6-2 &#8211; the most representation of any conference.  So Alabama doesn&#8217;t show up in their bowl game against Utah.  Makes sense.  They had no chance of winning the national title, but Utah did &#8230; so they out-played &#8216;Bama.</p>
<p>Then South Carolina lost.  So 2 SEC teams but it still has more bowl victories than the PAC-10.  And what&#8217;s that number again &#8230; 3 national title won by SEC teams in the last 3 years.  How many we won by the PAC-10 in the last 3 years?  Oh yeah.  None.</p>
<p>Paper tiger, indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cory</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aleigh/2009/01/08/bill-holden-bcs-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-17397</link>
		<dc:creator>cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=12029#comment-17397</guid>
		<description>The BCS isn&#039;t perfect, granted. Today, Texas, Utah and USC all have a complaint that they should be # 1, not Florida. But then you see the problem with a playoff. You&#039;d need at least two more rounds of games to determine the champion. Did you see the number of players being carted off last night? And some of them may have career ending injuries. Can you imagine what two more games would be like? To say nothing of that little thing called classes.
Now someone would say OK -start with 4, 8, 16 teams and hold the playoff so the Bowl games reduce the number of playoff games. 4 would be too few obviously - you&#039;re at 4 now, after all the games. 16 would be too many - how do you discriminate 14,15,and 16 from 17,18 and 19? Computers, Polls? They will complain, even if they have little chance of winning it all. Still the point is to be fair. So the reasonable number would be 8. Right now the only way you could have an 8 team playoff is the six major conference champions(ACC, Big East, SEC, Big 10, Big 12, Pac 10  and two other teams). Those two other teams would be sticklers. This year it would be hard to exclude Alabama and Texas, both 12-1. That means Utah doesn&#039;t make the playoffs. (If you include the Mountain West as one of your conferences, you leave little room for independents or other good teams- someone will get the shaft - and do you know they are really better than the ACC champion if you leave a major out?). 
Ironically, Utah probably wouldn&#039;t have made an 8 team playoff this year (even if they might have been better than some conference champs- but how would you tell that?) In the final analysis they will finish higher than they would have in a playoff system that excluded them. A playoff would have the same problem the current system has - someone will make a claim of being left out.
 In addition great games like Texas/TexasTech, Penn State/Iowa and Alabama/Florida would be less meaningful because the loser would still likely get into a playoff. USC might have won this year, and some other years with a playoff, true, but a playoff would have meant their loss to Oregon State would have meant nothing, because they would still get into the playoffs. Try telling the thousands of Oregon State fans who swarmed the field after their victory it meant nothing. 
Was Oklahoma/ florida the best game? Maybe, maybe not but it was certainly in the class photo. A playoff system wouldn&#039;t necessarily be fairer or have the two best teams (depending on upsets and pairings). It would still be the best team on a single day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BCS isn&#8217;t perfect, granted. Today, Texas, Utah and USC all have a complaint that they should be # 1, not Florida. But then you see the problem with a playoff. You&#8217;d need at least two more rounds of games to determine the champion. Did you see the number of players being carted off last night? And some of them may have career ending injuries. Can you imagine what two more games would be like? To say nothing of that little thing called classes.<br />
Now someone would say OK -start with 4, 8, 16 teams and hold the playoff so the Bowl games reduce the number of playoff games. 4 would be too few obviously &#8211; you&#8217;re at 4 now, after all the games. 16 would be too many &#8211; how do you discriminate 14,15,and 16 from 17,18 and 19? Computers, Polls? They will complain, even if they have little chance of winning it all. Still the point is to be fair. So the reasonable number would be 8. Right now the only way you could have an 8 team playoff is the six major conference champions(ACC, Big East, SEC, Big 10, Big 12, Pac 10  and two other teams). Those two other teams would be sticklers. This year it would be hard to exclude Alabama and Texas, both 12-1. That means Utah doesn&#8217;t make the playoffs. (If you include the Mountain West as one of your conferences, you leave little room for independents or other good teams- someone will get the shaft &#8211; and do you know they are really better than the ACC champion if you leave a major out?).<br />
Ironically, Utah probably wouldn&#8217;t have made an 8 team playoff this year (even if they might have been better than some conference champs- but how would you tell that?) In the final analysis they will finish higher than they would have in a playoff system that excluded them. A playoff would have the same problem the current system has &#8211; someone will make a claim of being left out.<br />
 In addition great games like Texas/TexasTech, Penn State/Iowa and Alabama/Florida would be less meaningful because the loser would still likely get into a playoff. USC might have won this year, and some other years with a playoff, true, but a playoff would have meant their loss to Oregon State would have meant nothing, because they would still get into the playoffs. Try telling the thousands of Oregon State fans who swarmed the field after their victory it meant nothing.<br />
Was Oklahoma/ florida the best game? Maybe, maybe not but it was certainly in the class photo. A playoff system wouldn&#8217;t necessarily be fairer or have the two best teams (depending on upsets and pairings). It would still be the best team on a single day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Des</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aleigh/2009/01/08/bill-holden-bcs-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-16941</link>
		<dc:creator>Des</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/?p=12029#comment-16941</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t possibly be less interested (well, maybe if it was Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi giving a speech on how they thought the government should be run).  I stopped caring about Bowl games 4 or 5 years ago.  I remember eagerly waiting for New Year&#039;s day, so I could park in front of the TV for 12 hours watching football and arguing who should be #1.  Now about a week after New Year&#039;s, we get the championship game on a Thursday night between two teams that may or may not even deserve to be playing in the game.  

I owe the College Presidents a debt of gratitude.  Now I find much better things to do with my time than to watch their games (and see their sponsors).  Thanks guys, I appreciate the help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t possibly be less interested (well, maybe if it was Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi giving a speech on how they thought the government should be run).  I stopped caring about Bowl games 4 or 5 years ago.  I remember eagerly waiting for New Year&#8217;s day, so I could park in front of the TV for 12 hours watching football and arguing who should be #1.  Now about a week after New Year&#8217;s, we get the championship game on a Thursday night between two teams that may or may not even deserve to be playing in the game.  </p>
<p>I owe the College Presidents a debt of gratitude.  Now I find much better things to do with my time than to watch their games (and see their sponsors).  Thanks guys, I appreciate the help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
