Why We Fight
by Andrew KlavanThis is by way of a friendly response to the estimable Jay Nordlinger, Senior Editor at the likewise estimable National Review. Jay wrote a strong column yesterday openly saying what I’ve been hearing many conservatives express tacitly ever since the election. Reflecting on the media’s disgraceful distortion of the characters of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Sarah Palin, he wrote:
“It seems to me that the Left has won: utterly and decisively. What I mean is, the Saturday Night Live, Jon Stewart, Bill Maher mentality has prevailed. They decide what a person’s image is, and those images stick. They are the ones who say that Cheney’s a monster, W.’s stupid, and Palin’s a bimbo. And the country, apparently, follows.”
I’ve been hearing and reading prominent conservatives and Republicans say nearly as much on television, in print and in private conversation ever since the election. They say Sarah Palin can never make a comeback. They say the fight for small government has been lost. They say we can’t have immigration reform that protects our borders. They say we have to distance ourselves from “embarrassing” commentators like Rush Limbaugh or Ann Coulter.
No, no, no, no. What the right is experiencing at the moment is a phenomenon called “cultural para-stimuli.” You can read all about it in Tom Wolfe’s wonderful novel I Am Charlotte Simmons. It’s sort of like peer pressure on steroids. It was discovered by Nobel Laureate Victor Ransome Starling, who found that when he surrounded normal cats with cats whose behavior had been bizarrely altered by brain surgery, the normal cats began acting like the crazy cats all around them.
That’s us–surrounded by the mainstream media. So steeped are we now in their lies about our representatives, their ridicule of our commentators, their demonizing dismissal of the causes we know are just, that we’ve begun to adopt their attitudes toward ourselves! And perhaps chief among the lies they’ve sold us is the lie that they’ve won, that the media are theirs for good and all, and that Americans are going to be hoodwinked and brainwashed by their constant barrage of misinformation forever.
Well, only if we let them. And only if we in the media surrender first.
Look, the American media are in a bad way, a disastrous way. Movies, TV, literature–instead of illuminating vehicles for art and entertainment, they’ve become like the Matrix, replacing reality with a plausible leftist imitation. Journalists especially have so shamed themselves in their coverage of the last election–hounding Sarah Palin’s daughter and Joe the Plumber while all but ignoring Barack Obama’s ties to Illinois corruption, and his long and deep association with the racist anti-American Jeremiah Wright–that it’s going to take them years to recover. When people shame themselves that badly, they don’t admit it in a hurry. They savage their critics instead and continue their own shameful practices as a kind of defiant denial–anything rather than look in the mirror and confront what they’ve turned themselves into.
So yeah, we’re on our own for now. But we’re not unarmed and we’re in no way defeated. We have great politicians like Sarah Palin–who could well be president in not eight years but four–honest newsmen like Bret Baer and genius commentators like Rush–and Ann Coulter, who’s only about ten times smarter, funnier and more talented as a satirist than Jon Stewart or Bill Maher will ever be. The left can’t out-argue these mind-warriors so they try to ridicule, disdain and isolate them, to make us feel ashamed that we admire and respect them. And they tell us they’re finished, washed-up. Why, just look, it must be true: it’s right there in the newspapers and on TV.
They’re lying. The left has to lie for the simple reason that they’re wrong and we’re right, their policies don’t work and ours do. Look at the cities that liberal politicians and programs have devoured like locusts. Look at the liberal states that can’t rein in their spending even as they go broke. Look at how environmentalists have made us energy-slaves to monsters overseas. And look at how leftist, anti-patriotic and anti-religious policies in Europe have turned a once-great culture into a corpse that is being consumed by Islamo-fascist bacteria as we watch.
Hey, listen, our soldiers have to get shot at in the cause of liberty. All we in the media have to do is keep telling people the truth. Lies and insults are all the left has got to sling against us. They only win if we start to believe them.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
681 Comments
The repulsive, double-standard used on Sarah Palin is ACTUALLY the reason I am even here on this website in the first place.
So, yes, I had decided to give up, and sit this one out as soon as I heard that McCain somehow was handed the nomination, and I cared even less about Palin.
UNTIL… Until I realized how vehemently 'everybody' seemed to despise her, and the vile way that I saw her portrayed at every turn. So I started tuning in to Rush, and others, more often, and started trying to retrieve that good old "feeling" I used have as a kid under Reagan.
Only then did I stop playing with the idea of voting for Ron Paul, and realize that there actually still were some actual Republicans actually capable of getting the world's attention. Sure, I may agree on policy with Ron Paul, but the ridiculous hatred of Palin caught my attention more than the callous ignoring of him.
I don't know if it needs to be her in particular, but someone very much like her, is just what the party needs to get people like myself from giving up.
The more outrageously intolerant they are of someone, I have come to learn, the better they are for us.
I know of several people's votes that Ron Paul lost due to the mistreatment of Palin.
Maybe it's time for closed primaries?
“Great politicians like Sarah Palin?” Really? Honestly? I don’t know *that* many conservatives, but there isn’t a single one who shares that schoolgirl crush. I read a number of conservative columnists, and none of them share it either (Daniel Larison comes to mind, among others).
I guess it’s an Eye of the Beholder thing. Or maybe you’re so used to playing defense that you find it necessary to defend, you know, the indefensible too. And hey, maybe you actually believe Joe the Plumber is a great foreign correspondent.
It’s possible, I guess. But it’s worth reminding you that the people who find Palin somewhat, I dunno, insubstantial — including all of those conservatives — aren’t *lying* merely because they hold a different opinion than you do. This is in fact what they believe. (And no, they’re not engaged in falsehood in order to sink a threat to their hegemony. I can’t imagine anyone I’d rather see run against Obama in 2012 than Pain; and that opinion is shared by almost every Dem strategist out there, if only because it offers up the possibility of permanent minority status for the GOP — at least until Jeb Bush runs.)
But I’m guessing you know that.
It just pains me to hear friends and coworkers — sometimes very intelligent people — mindlessly parrotting the latest media spin on Iraq/Palin/Whatever. Liberals believe the media because it tells the lies they want to hear. So many others seem to go along because they can’t conceive that the media would lie to them.
Until our alleged education system starts again teaching youngsters to analyze objectively and think critically for themselves, and to learn actual useful information instead of feel good liberal garbage intended to elevate self-esteem, this massive brainwashing campaign conducted by the MSM will continue to succeed.
George Carlin (RIP) had some wicked comments on this subject.
Two points: John McCain was the absolute worst possible “face” the Republican party could have nominated in 2008 — an out of touch geezer with yellow teeth who was proud he didn’t know how to email.
He literally drove young reasonable conservatives right into the arms of Obama, simply due to his irritating and grating personality…. and the fact that McCain is the ultimate WASHINGTON DC insider…. exactly what no one wants in a President.
Not to mention that McCain couldn’t articulate a conservative position or value to save his Washington insider butt. (McCain has long detested values voter conservative faith centered Republicans)
Secondly, GWB likewise made the conservative (Republican Party) look like we were inept and wrong because he simply refused to fight the constant attacks from the liberal media and the wacky lib Democrats.
Hell, Bush NEVER should have allowed Scooter Libby to be prosecuted. Never. That was a travesty of justice, and just fed the liberal narrative that the Bush admin was corrupt.
Likewise on Hurricane Katrina. ALL the helicopters were consumed with saving lives for three days, like they should have been.
It took the national Guard two days to clear roads 80-miles around New Orleans before they could transport any REAL aid to victims…. yet Bush fired his FEMA guy and agreed with the lib media that he screwed up.
I wanted to barf. Bush should have pointed the finger right back at the “chocolate” mayor and the incompetent Democrat governor.
Love the term “Islamo-fascist bacteria”.
Palin’s colorful criticism of Couric is enough for me to get excited about voting for her in four years.
Conservative think tanks (or the Republican Party) should begin an immediate media campaign blitz outlining the looooong list of Democrat corruption, and Democrat duplicity in ruining the economy.
Full-page ads. TV commercials on the Super Bowl. Launch a nationwide of road signs (similar to campaign signs) blaming the Democrats for illegal immigration crime, and job loss.
HIT BACK HARD and DO IT NOW, before the Obama acolytes in the media annoint him any further.
Thank you for your military service, Mr. Klavan. We should all be grateful that you put your life on the line for your country, and that you came back alive.
Geez, Harley, the reason the Left ravages Palin now is because they’re scared of the possibility of her running in 2012. Destroy her now while we can is their mantra. If she’s not a threat as you seem to think, then they wouldn’t take their time with her and quit talking about her. She’s definitely smarter than you think she is, just not as seasoned in dealing with the media. That will change. And if she decides to run for the Prez, then you’ll see how vile the Left can really be and how they’ll try to make her into what she’s not: a person that regular Americans can readily identify with and gladly support.
I wish I could agree with you, but the media in irrevocably left wing and that’s it. They all come from the same elite schools, taught by the same professors, who are almost all former hippies who could only bear to hold a job as a techer, rather than join the rest of mainstream society. This isnt going to change. The professors who replace the current left wing fools will themselves be indoctrinated by the same guys, so it is a perpetual thing. So the “elite” media will continue to be stocked by the same people who think the same way and be hired by people who sare their worldview.
And now, our society is more plugged into the media than ever. There isn’t a person in America that isn’t accessed by internet, tv news, radio, popular music, tv shows or movies on a daily basis. All of these, every single one, is completely, myopically, left wing. There isn’t one person in Hollywood who can greenlight a film or tv show who isn’t a liberal. Not one.
And please don’t think the left is unaware of this. This is a new paradigm, my friend. It goes something like this: why spend the time, effort and money trying to appeal to 300 million voters when you can just appeal to 10,000 or so media types, who in turn will instruct the electorate how to vote through propaganda, lying and whatever other subtle and not so subtle means are at their disposal? So that’s where the battle between liberalism and conservatism will be waged from now on, trying to win over the media. Yes, the same media that already polls 90% liberal. Any guesses to who has the lead in that contest?
The day of the American election is OVER. The media is going to decide who is elected, this Obama election is just the beginning. But here’s the good news: get ready for Camelot part deux. Know why? Because even if the sky is falling and the king has no clothes, it will be reported that the day is clear and the king is a minimalist. And the folks in America, given this information from virtually all outlets will believe it. And when Fox News is shut down, and the fairness doctrine shuts down talk radio, the victory will be complete.
Sorry to be so cynical about this, but unfortunately, I think it’s the truth. I wish I could give my name, but I work in Hollywood, so this is impossible. I have kids and a mortgage and my career would be over if I did. I will tell you I have been in many a room where I was asumed to be a liberal, and it is a clearly planned out thing to include liberal dogma in every storyline in both the films and tv shows I have worked on. God help us.
Alan, fair enuf. And yes, I’m sure she’s smarter than people give her credit for, after all, she’s managed to move up the political ladder with impressive speed. Having said that, there’s a lot of data out there that suggests she was a drag on the GOP ticket last time around, and in fact did more to elect Obama than her running mate. Given that, I genuinely don’t think anyone fears a Palin run the next time around, if only because you rarely get a chance in politics to correct a bad first impression. And again, if you look at the data, her first impression wasn’t so good — at least outside the base of the party. As for the Left ravaging her? I don’t think they care one way or the other right now. Fairly or not, she’s closer to a punch line than a threat. This could change, of course. And it’s worth remembering that nobody took Reagan seriously either.
But Reagan articulated a vision for America that the populace embraced. I haven’t heard anything from Palin thus far except a rather pale imitation of what Reagan said, and said over twenty-five years ago.
I would think Jindal, Bush (Jeb), and others would offer better candidacies. Heck, the guy I feared the most was Giuliani. But the fundies probably won’t allow that to happen.
And that’s the real problem Palin presents. She is seen as the candidate of James Dobson and the rest of the social conservatives, the fundie pinup girl for a new generation. That’s simply not a majority candidate, no matter how much love she gets at the convention.
Also, and just for the record, when Blacklist says that liberal dogma is a planned inclusion in every storyline in films and TV shows, he’s either talking out of his butt or has had the misfortune to work on some truly awful movies and TV shows. Or, and this is more likely, hasn’t worked a great deal at either.
With the illegitimate grandchild and the crank dealer-in-law, Sarah Palin has the Southern vote locked.
Oh my God this blog continues to entertain! “The Left is scared of Palin.” Ha! She’s the gift that keeps on giving. And by the way, make up your mind about “The Left.” Are the “media” and “The Left” so powerful that they can easily crush Palin like a bug? Or is it scared of Palin’s ideas and on the run? You can’t have it both ways, which is it? And if Palin has this incredible connection with “regular Americans” why doesnt the media just exploit that connection and sell more PEOPLE and US magazines? Face it, Palin was soundly rejected by the people. By the end of the campaign her poll numbers even with Republicans were pathetic. So Im curious as to who these “regular Americans” are and why they’re hiding. Are Americans pussies afraid to express their feelings? I certainly wouldn’t say that, but you seem to think so. Or wait, maybe America did speak.
Liberals have the money. As long as that’s the case, we’re going to be on the defensive. We’ve got to get homefield advantage back.
Here is the problem as I view it. Too many conservatives as well as some conservative pundits think Sarah and others should not defend themselves against the unfair treatment by the MSM. They should just fade quietly away. One of the main things they are missing is this is NOW and not 4 years or more ago when anyone defending themselves against media attacks were just asking for more of the same. (G. Bush did that and what did it get him..more of the same bad press) Most people do not get their news from newspapers any more, in fact, many are folding. There use to be only 3 major networks plus CNN. The new media is the Net and Blogs. This is where people are getting their news or what they think is the news and bad or uncorrected news travels very fast on the net. The Republicans have been slow in recognizing that they need more skilled and organized people to respond immediately to these vile and often untrue comments being made about conservatives. There need to be more sites like this where people can get the truth.
Also, I think the conservatives don’t hang together like the liberals do. I have been told Obama paid OBOTS and Trolls to immediately defend him and make favorable comments on blogs. We conservatives seem to think we have greater, better and bigger ideas then the liberals and need to be stating our ideas instead of being bothered by another conservative being beat up by the media. If every candidate and conservative came out and defended the unfair treatment like Joe the Plumber and Sarah have had from the MSM I think we might get their attention. WE AREN’T GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE. That doesn’t mean you have to agree with what JTP or Sarah says or what their motives might be…but we all need to defend their right to say it and their right to be treated with respect. I hate it when I see some conservative pundit on the MSM say: “They just need to go back to their home state and do this or that”. Until we unite the MSM will continue to do this…we need to say to ourselves…WHO WILL BE NEXT ON THEIR CHOPPING BLOCK?
The fact is, the liberal leftwing bias and USA hate of the hard left is being exposed for what it is, USA hate and bias of the worst kind. The left wing liberal establishment of media is dedicated to destroying America and replacing it with the caliphate.
[...] Big Hollywood » Blog Archive » Why We Fight. No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI [...]
It may be over, but I ain’t givin’ up.
I would rather fail in a righteous cause than give up and join an unrighteous one.
Novak is right, we live in a Matrix. Its time take the Red Pill and lead the resistance from our Zion, Big Hollywood.
I’m not sure who is Morpheus or who is Neo, but we are going to keep on fighting.
Will you take the Lefty Blue Pill, or you can take the conservative Red Pill and see how deep the rabbit-hole goes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te6qG4yn-Ps#
DANG. You nailed it, Mr. Klavan.
They say we have to distance ourselves from “embarrassing” commentators like Rush Limbaugh or Ann Coulter.
Hell no! The Left loves to scream about Ann Coulter’s propensity to say things that they classify as “Shocking!” or “Offensive!”. The thing is that some of the things she says ARE shocking and offensive…because she is absolutely correct and in saying those things, she lays bare for anyone paying attention the fact that Left continually gets to pass off myths, half-truths,and outright lies as THE TRUTH, and they continually get a pass.
Great politicians like Sarah Palin?” Really? Honestly?
Hmmm. Serves as mayor in major city in her home state. Exposes corruption in her own party and gets offender ousted. Runs against incumbent from her own party and wins, defeats candidate from other party, gets elected Governor, is recognized as an “up and comer” with integrity and executive experience, and is tapped as a VP candidate on her party’s ticket. In terms of a political career, that is fairly impressive, whether or not you like her. More meat in that record than BHO’s, although since the press never showed an interest into actually looking into his career and associates, most people would never know it. This would explain the successful and falacious motif repeated ad nauseum in the last election cycle that could be best paraphrased as : A junior first term Senator from Chicago, with a record of voting “present”, unless it is a chance to deny basic comfort care to babies with the temerity to survive their mother’s attempts to murder them, who was a state Senator when he took that sterling opportunity to stand up and be counted, who was a “community organizer” who worked closely with the leading “Get out the vote fraud” group, and was president of law review at Harvard, apparently without having published anything himself, ABSOLUTELY has more experience than the woman who managed to be a wife, parent, mayor, reformer (that would be real reform, not talking about “Change” and “Hope”), and oh yeah, Governor of her state.
Do any of you BHO supporters have any idea how utterly ridiculous you sound to anyone who isn’t swallowing the DNC/MSM talking points hook, line, and sucker?
LODO GRDZAK
And thus with a wave of his magic wand and a choice sentences the entire mainstream media is once again shown to be “Objective”.
When will the cultural Marxists finally concede the media is theirs? Is there a person on the planet who believe the media is not leftist?
As to Palin, I’m not fan. She may be competent and the media may have taken her down, but we are missing the conservative intellectuals of old in the movement right now….Buckley, Bloom, Neuhaus, etc.
Rebuild with the smart guys at the helm, find another “Great Communicator” instead of Marge Gunderson from Fargo, start “Advancing” conservative ideals instead of playing “Defense”.
Harley said: “She is seen as the candidate of James Dobson and the rest of the social conservatives, the fundie pinup girl for a new generation. That’s simply not a majority candidate, no matter how much love she gets at the convention.”
Prop 8 kind of refutes that point rather soundly. It passed in a liberal state who did not vote for Palin (no one who voted Republican this past year actually voted *FOR* McCain, you know–they voted for Palin or *against* Obama).
Prop 8 was a socially conservative issue. And it won.
Conservativism always wins. Hands down. No contest. That’s why liberals are scared of it. It’s also why Republicans need to close primary polls to non-Republicans, so the liberals can’t select our candidates for us. If they did that, I might just rejoin the party.
Hey Harley,
You can’t have freedom without a moral framework. Religion IS freedom.
What you didn’t see the movie TRON?
Fundies Schmundies
Reagan was treated terrible by the press also. They said he was dumb, just a 3rd rate actor, a hick from Illinois, no great education, etc. etc.
He was divorced..and no one would ever vote for a person who was divorced for Pres. Never, underestimate a good looking candidate that has that certain “something” that comes natural and can’t be taught. Palin has that. The only time McCain was ahead was the first two weeks she was with him.
“honest newsmen like Bret Baer and genius commentators like Rush–and Ann Coulter”
Ahmen Brother! Every time I hear someone talk about how bad Rush is, I ask them to dispute any facts that Rush has made on his show. Guess what? No takers, not one. And the richer they are, the more intellectual and “we have to help out the little people with YOUR money” attitude they have. Never mind the fact that one of their “intellectual” arguements I overheard two of them in was the fact that Sarah Palin shopped at Target! They said they would never vote for anyone that shopped at Target!!! So fight on brothers…research the facts…Google policies made by their politicians without telling them the author and see if they are for it against it so you can show them for the sound bites they are. Watch how quickly they change their stance because “they didn’t hear you correctly the first time.” Don’t get surprised when they start raising their voices. Just remind them that just because they are yelling, doesn’t mean they are right.
Harley,
You obviously have never listened to Palin speak. I don’t know who you listen to but it isn’t Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin is the epitome of what is reviled by the Liberals. She is a woman who didn’t need an Ivy School to become a governor.
She has what has been decidedly lacking in most of our so called Republican leaders. Back-bone, charisma and compelling arguments for the conservative viewpoints. She has a willingness to stand up.
Part of the reason the Media are still talking about her is two-fold. One, she is a ratings grabber. The second is that she represents an extreme danger to all the liberal lies propagated by the media.
Go listen to her. I dare you. I double dog dare you.
Peter, I would suggest that Prop 8 won because gay marriage remains a controversial issue — though less controversial than it was even as little as five years ago. (And as conservatives like to remind us, even President-elect Obama opposes gay marriage.) The latter has little to do with ascendant conservatism, or the weird idea that ‘conservatism always wins’, an idea that would require ignoring the last two election cycles (‘06 & ‘08).
As for Palin, Nate Silver hits the nail head:
I think we can acknowledge that Palin had a rough go of things with the media. But I think we can also acknowledge one of the central mistakes made by both the McCain and Hillary Clinton campaigns: they treated the media as an exogenous factor, something which happens to them, rather than something within their locus of control. Complaining about the media is not a media strategy.
Nor do I know that Palin is liable to get much sympathy outside of her base. There hasn’t been much polling on Palin lately, but there was an NBC/WSJ (.pdf) poll conducted about a month ago asked for favorability ratings on the four Presidential contenders and found Palin stuck in neutral, at 35/45 positive/negative in December as opposed to 39/48 in late October, with 30 percent still holding a strongly negative view of her. John McCain saw his negatives soften significantly, as did Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, and as had John Kerry following the 2004 election — but not Palin (Joe Biden’s ratings, for the record, were also not terrific).
People weren’t turned off by Palin because of the questions about her wardrobe or baby Trig. They were turned off because — fairly or not — they couldn’t become comfortable with the idea of her sitting in the White House. Giving interviews to the likes of John Ziegler or exchanging nastygrams with the Anchorage Daily News isn’t going to get her to be taken more seriously.
‘Complaining about the media is not a media strategy.’ Amen.
[...] altered by brain surgery, the normal cats began acting like the crazy cats all around them. Continue reading… Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)The View ladies hashing out Prop 8 again.What [...]
Joel, I have listened to her. I just don’t see what you see. And again, the most recent numbers suggest you’re in the minority when it comes to this. That may change over time. I don’t think it will.
It’s quite simple really. The media is attempting to destroy Palin now because with her experience on the national stage, there’s absolutely no way she allows Couric to question whether or not she reads or Gibson to manifest a single Bush doctrine that is many layers thick. This travesty in the media doesn’t get talked about in back corners of a campaign bus. Instead, it will be front page news, with Palin, or whomever is the Republican nominee leading the way.
I do find it ironic that the media would attempt to shame Palin from talking about their bias when they had no problems with fightthesmears.org. I know Obama’s website was set up to combat supposed Republican smears, but the media is liberal, so fighting their smears is akin to fighting the Democratic smears as well.
I can only hope these liberals on this post are right and that the left is so thankful for the “gift that keeps on giving.” In four short years, it could very possibly take it all away. And if she’s ready then like she seems to be now, ready to come out swinging against all detractors, selling that classically superior conservative brand, they’ve got no shot.
President Palin
President Sarah Palin
Nice ring to it.
Vice President . . . Sinise?
Anyone who looks at the last two election cycles and determines that conservatism lost is seeing only what they want to. What lost, big government? Failure to control our borders? Entitlements? Someone seems to believe that because Bush was a conservative, he governed like one. Give me a break. Conservatives stopped voting for the Republican party. Not because the country turned left, because the results they were getting from so-called conservatives were left enough.
Republicans are reading this all wrong if they believe that we want them to be liberal lites. After speaking with some politicians and even participating in some Republican polling, I think they are at least getting the message. Though, obviously, some people are still going to believe what they want.
It’s so nice to read a column that mirrors my own opinions. What a change!
Thank you, Mr. Klavan
No there is not. There is a lot of liberal spinning to suggest she was a drag on the GOP ticket.
The REAL drag on the GOP ticket was that damn RINO McCain. The ONLY reason I held my nose and voted for him was as a vote for Palin and I guarantee you I’m with the majority of the GOP base on this.
Were it not for Palin, McCain would have lost by 15-20% of the popular vote instead of the 7.2% he lost by.
Liberals and Democrats are scared to DEATH of this woman because she stands the best chance of dethroning The One in 4 years. This BS about her being a drain on the GOP and/or costing McCain the election is nothing but Big Lie theory in action on the part of the Democrats.
I suspect that’s because you’re not a conservative. I also don’t see what Chris Matthews sees in this Obama character … The only way I would feel a tingle go down my leg when listening to him is if I was sitting with my legs crossed too long and one fell asleep.
Oh, people, please.
Is this what conservatism is revealed as?
A portrayal of alleged enemies as “bacteria,” (See Hitler, A.: “Jews are vermin”) & an admission that the only quality or policy needed for a conservative candidate is a willingness to colorfully criticize a news anchor.
Not that I’m a fan of the MSM or Couric either. (Interesting, if oddly disturbing, that each side sees such incredible bias toward the other side in the media, isn’t it?)
It’s as I said on a couple of other threads, we conservatives have to begin to think of ourselves as revolutionaries because that’s really what we are now. One of the things we have to do is to reclaim the name “liberal”–as in the classical liberalism of Adam Smith and Benjamin Constant–from the Left which hijacked it in this country following the Second World War. WE are the voices for change–not those on the Left–they’re now the Establishment. WE are the voices for individual liberty and freedom. WE are the voices for individual responsibility–not the Left. Once we start doing that, I think you’ll find that all sorts of creative doors and ideas will suddenly present themselves as we’ll start thinking more out of the box as far as getting our message out.
As for Sarah Palin, she is a diamond in the rough who scares the pants off the leftists here (note I don’t call them liberals because they are not liberal in ANY sense of the word)–otherwise, they would just plain ignore her. She scares them because she stands for everything they hate and despise and because they know she draws a lot of popular support. Like any diamond, she needs polishing, but that can be taken care of and she’s got plenty of time. Other leaders will also emerge to join her.
One final note: All conservatives, or, rather, true liberals, should acquaint themselves with Herbert Marcuse’s “Repressive Tolerance” as that is the witting or unwitting guide used by the leftist trolls here and on other sites to silence opposition voices and is also the guide used to stifle conservative thought on college campuses, Hollywood, and in other venues. Know and understand the opposition’s playbook.
Zundfolge, that negative data has nothing to do with liberal spinning. It’s just numbers, polling data that reflects public opinion. And no, it’s not always accurate. But it this case it’s been fairly consistent regarding Palin. And was confirmed by the election itself.
You can ignore it all you want. But that probably won’t’ change the outcome the next time around either. Better to invest in politicians who actually have a chance of winning. LIke Bobby Jindal or Jeb Bush.
What I see is a politician who doesn’t hold focus groups to decide what we want to hear. A person who actually operates from a belief structure, not one who operates from what is politically feasible or expedient.
Putting it another way, she tilted at the windmill and won.
She is now a viable candidate.
BTW, I never listened to that Katie Couric interview, nor the second one with that geezer with the glasses. I knew it was going to be a hatchet job from the get go. Totally designed to embarrass and destroy her and who was her running mate? I just blanked on his name.
Oh well, he wasn’t memorable any way. She is.
Palin has five kids, a college degree, worked as a broadcaster, was a successful athlete, ran her own business, built herself up in politics starting at the bottom and took on her own party along the way. She did all this while having a family and a husband that worked. She became a governor of a state that is a logistical nightmare for anyone to even consider and has an 80-percent approval rating.
But of course, to our intelligent and fact-oriented liberal trolls, its all about the incestual child, highly-edited interviews and whatever they want. What a bunch of sheep.
JOHNNWAYNE,
Did someone mention an ‘incestual child’ in here? Look, I’m not gonna argue the point. It’s like criticizing Mohammed to a Muslim. You see her as the future of the Republican Party and Conservative movement. I also see her as a possible future — but in my view, she’s the future of the Democratic party, if only because she will help drive her own into permanent minority status.
Thank you for giving me a bit of hope! As I watched the media’s lies win this election on November 4th, I had just about lost it.
Juju, you hit it right on the nose about so-called conservative commentators. Too many wrote and or opined about the Palin interview with John Ziegler that she should not have done it. WHY? Should she not have some forum to defend herself against the most lunatic fringe comments mainstreamed? ABOSOLUTLY! She has to use this time, right after the campaign to hit back at those who NEVER, NEVER, NEVER actually hit on her for her policies and governance of Alaska, or Wasilla. No, it was all the background noise. About Bristol. About her family. About what life is like in Alaska. And, here is a clue. The left is scared s—less about Gov. Palin. As they were about another governor-Ronald Reagan. Please, all of this was done to Ronald Reagan. And, he was a product of Hollywood. Let Gov. Palin defend herself now, go out and govern the rest of this year and win reelection in 2010. A lot of Republicans should win in 2010. If they stop listening to so-called conservative commentators. Oh, BTW, great post Andrew!
Harley,
You are starting to sound more and more like a liberal. Why are you so afraid of Palin?
Mr. Klavan, this is the best piece I’ve read in weeks. Am so glad to have stumbled onto this site from Drudge. Thanks to Beit Bart for making it possible!!
IMO many so-called liberals are simply taking the path of least resistance under the impression that this is what will make them look good. I believe we greatly underestimate the power of the ‘look good’ part of the equation. At heart, I suspect they are without principle, guided only by the need to ‘appear’ to be the person that is going to win approval. Their act is a thin veneer indeed…a little hardship, financial or otherwise, and they revert to another (more rewarding) ‘act’.
McCain was the candidate to fear according to the smart Dems. Palin, like Reagan before her, is unelectable. Simple minded, even. The opposition is tone deaf to our best candidates and only connects with the ones who are closest to them. Libs don’t understand conservatism, but the rest of the country does. If she wants it, Palin can nail the top job. And when it happens, the left won’t be asking themselves what they missed. They will be too busy vilifying her and demanding to know what is wrong with the rest of the country.
There is a lot to be said for largely bypassing the press. “Hey, guys! Give me a break. I just answered 6 questions!” So far, we do better turning to alternative media than trying to get the mainstream to act honestly.
Joel, I’m genuinely not afraid of her. That may be a mistake. But I’m not. I know that she excites the base, heck, she’s a rock star with that segment of the voting public. But Palin has a lotta work to do if she’s hoping to become a successful national candidate. Right now, the critics far outweigh the supporters, and bear in mind, some of the harshest criticism she received was from the Right (Kathleen Parker at the National Review, for example). I genuinely believe Bobby Jindal or Jeb Bush would be superior candidates.
Hey Harley where are you getting your “numbers” from?
Gee I wonder, could it be …. Nah you wouldn’t be getting these numbers from liberal sources.
The fact is Sarah Palin petrifies pansies like you (I’m sorry I got all liberal on you and attacked your character but what the hell).As for Ann Coulter she only confuses people like you with facts and her wit. I have yet to hear any liberal that can dispute her facts, they just accuse her of trying to sell her books (as if an author trying to sell their work is a crime)by being controversial. If you notice her facts are never disputed, unless of course they get their “numbers” from the same source as you Harley
Interesting article. This seems to be an ongoing debate going back a long, long way.
My own take is that those who seem to fare best, in even an inhospitable media environment, are those who insist, in one way or another, on not being Victims. To the extent that the contemporary Media manage to cast us in the role of Victims, to that extent the Media wins.
On the other hand, to the extent that we refuse to simply prostrate ourselves before the Zeitgeist, to the extent that we speak the Truth without defensiveness, and with clarity and boldness, to that extent the Truth wins.
The best example historically of this kind of success is of course Ronald Reagan and William F. Buckley Jr. Mark Steyn and Sarah Palin exemplify the same kind of happy warriors. And I think Big Hollywood seems to be shaping up in the same tradition as well.
Setting aside for the moment whether or not the “Eeeeeevil-Gay/Jewish/Liberal-Media-Conspiracy” exists, here’s the thing about dealing with a mythic beast such as this: It doesn’t have any lethal “weapons” of it’s own making – it can only turn what it’s opponent has against it. If you don’t hand it the rope, it can’t hang you.
However one may feel about Reagan, when he was first gearing up as president the running-gag was that he was a boob, an actor playing dressup, etc. It failed to stick, because he very quickly demonstrated that he WASN’T “that guy.” No rope given, no hanging recieved.
The current crop of Republican “It Kids” are all, across the board, TERRIBLE at not letting their strengths (such as they are) be turned around into vulnerability. George W. Bush won the hearts of “conservatives” – over the VASTLY more-qualified 2000 version of McCain – with his (mostly put-on) “I’m a hayseed cowpoke ya wanna get some brews with” persona… the same persona that made it easy soon after for his opponents to paint him as a moron – though, in that case, the fact that he actually DOES appear to be a legitimate MORON much of the time didn’t help. Mitt Romney doesn’t seem to “get” that the Square-Jawed-Daddy-Figure routine that so endears him to people nostalgiac for a “good old days” that only ever existed on sitcoms also makes him look like a less-expressive-than-usual Ken Doll. Bobby Jindal’s “I’ve faced down an exorcism!!!” backstory gives the Holy Rollers the vapors… but it’s going to make him look like a LUNATIC in a primary.
And then there’s Sarah Palin. I’m inclined to be nicer to her, because I have a certain sympathy for what seems to be her position: She didn’t go looking for this. She didn’t run in the primaries. She’d never made any serious note (so far as anyone can tell) of wanting to be President. She got grabbed for this thing for ONE reason (okay, THREE reasons but the other two you couldn’t really make out in the initial headshots…): A brilliantly cynical ploy by the Republicans to try and scoop up the votes of white women who were angry at Obama for denying them the chance to shove “President Hillary” in their husbands/boyfriends/fathers faces. Seemed like a great idea at the time.
BUT she had the same problem Bush does: “Aw shucks, folks! I’m just a simple folk minivan momma just like all y’all!” turns into “I’m a dope” REALLY easily if you don’t work against it. The Party picked her to be a Fetish Doll, she turned out to be a Cartoon. It happens.
You want to win in eight years? (And it’s GOING TO BE eight years. Might as well get used to it.) First step is to drop these clowns. All of them. They FAILED. The “right” dragged the entire rusty, cobwebbed old arsenal out to battle what they were SURE would be Clinton II in the Final Battle of The Boomer Culture Wars; and while you were busy swinging dull-edged old battle-axes like Coulter and Roe against what turned out to be an unwitting decoy Obama showed up and drove a Brand New Paradigm right the hell over everyone.
“Conservatives” can count among their recent victories ONLY Proposition 8, which for all the sturm and drang and simply a delay of the innevitable. Nationwide legal same-sex marriage will now take TEN years to come about instead of five or six. I ask again: You wanna win? Drop these clowns, AND the foolishness the represent. Let the “social conservatives” and the religious nutters continue their inexorable march to irrelevance without you. Stop promising to turn the country “back” into Pleasantville. Stop fighting losing battles against equal rights and reproductive freedom. Get back to the core: Lower taxes, smaller government, greater personal freedom. Memorize it, say it often, and MEAN IT… and MAYBE you’ll get back into the game at some point.
How sad that some posts on here show that people having made their minds up about Sarah Palin based on OTHER PEOPLE’S OPINIONS. Are we on the Right to be SHEEP like those on the left and only form our opinions based on what some “conservative columnists” think. HELP ME UNDERSTAND THAT RIDICULOUS CONCEPT. I think for myself and I supported this woman.
Stop falling into those shallow pits that the left digs for us. FACTS should mold your opinions – not simply other people’s opinions. We MINDLESS generations of young people who now excel at texting and FAIL MISERABLY AT THINKING. They accept everything that spills from the mouths of left wing educators and mindless entertainment sources. All they want is to be titillated – actually using their brain is of no interest to them. They also want to be KEPT. And this financial burden of keeping them goose steps toward more and more socialism.
We endured 8 years of Clinton (The Creep) – we can tough it out for 4 with PREZ-BO. STOP LISTENING TO TALKING HEADS AND STAND ON YOUR OWN PRINCIPLES AND OPINIONS.
Just wanted to remind you all… that in spite of having the weakest candidate,( and I’m not referring to Palin) and the tremendous adversity of the biased media…Obama won by 52% of the vote…not exactly a mandate…There are still a significant number of Americans that are not bewitched by the “the emperor’s new clothes”…people who are capable of doing their own research and thinking for themselves…people who do believe in God , Country, and Family..unless they can manage to import enough illegals into this country to severely disrupt the numbers as they are (although most Latinos are principled and religious people)..they have won nothing…sure they have the Presidency …but I truly believe that conservative principles do appeal to the vast majority of Americans..we just have to have candidates that are able to convey them…..
Charles Delacroix,
All I can say is, well said.
Harley,
Not everyone can be bred a general. There are such things field promotions and I think Sarah Palin is qualified for one.
Like it or not, the MSM can control the agenda and get whomever they want elected. Sarah Palin was destroyed (permanently, imo) by one hit-job after another. Nothing she could have done would have prevented the slide in her poll numbers.
Compare poor Palin’s treatment to the fawning Obama got. The guy gives a good speech, but he was far from extraordinary in interviews and his debate performances (both in the primary and general election). He’s just another politician. But the MSM has created an almost mass-hysteria where Obama is literally worshiped.
The fact remains that with the MSM seizing control, Republicans will never win the Presidency again, imo. Nothing can be done anymore. I used to be a political junkie…listened to Limbaugh every day. I haven’t tuned in since election day. What’s the point? As far as I’m concerned, Palin should come out with guns blazing. Go after not just the liberal MSM, but also the elitist, snobby beltway “conservatives” like Parker, Noonan, Will, etc.
I just hope Republicans will try to make Obama’s life a living hell like the Dems and MSM did to Sarah Palin.
Andrew–I’m sure you know, but just so it’s clear to readers: “Nobel Laureate Victor Ransome Starling” is a fictional character, and his experiments are fictional, too. The story about the cats at the top of the novel is a device Wolfe uses to foreshadow what he will demonstrate in the book. (All Wolfe’s work is wonderful, and this novel is especially great.)
By the time I reached the “cultural para-stimuli” paragraph, I heard a choir of angels singing.
That was fantastic.
And you took it straight home – we don’t have to dodge bullets, only opinions.
Maybe the most important rhyme we ever learned as children is: Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never harm me.
Yes, these liberals are using just words. Just speeches. If a dissenting opinion prompts our voluntary silence, then we were people living without conviction.
We were cowards all along.
The fact remains that with the MSM seizing control, Republicans will never win the Presidency again, imo. Nothing can be done anymore. I used to be a political junkie…listened to Limbaugh every day. I haven’t tuned in since election day. What’s the point?
Every time I hear someone going on like this, I wonder why they don’t just kill themselves forthwith and be spared any further pain.
Come on, Greg! Where’s your faith? The Old Media (I won’t give it the satisfaction of being called the MSM) is an aging dinosaur due to collapse under its own ponderous weight, taking all those morons like Chris Matthews and Katie Couric with it. And as it falls, the New Media will rise. Smart and innovative entrepreneurs will find a way to harness the Internet’s limitless potential and turn websites into the new bastions of truthful and honest reporting. And when that happens, we the conservatives will regain our full voice…and the loony leftists won’t stand a chance.
At the very least, don’t EVER go down without a fight. It doesn’t become you or any of us.
Really folks, lets get over it. I lost my son, Capt. Derek Argel on Memorial Day of 2005. So focused on their mission, two on his plane, did not take time to pin their new Captain’s bars on the morning they died. They were Spec Ops Warriors. They were few in numbers, and the best of the best. My son was 28 years old, and was a soldier who served; God, Country and Family. Derek never waisted one moment of life. Derek was not influenced by “actors” but by real men. He grew up in a household that enjoyed movies and entertainment, but appreciated them as just that. Actors are role playing fictious characters. Since my son’s death, I have worked hard to help the children of the fallen know that they live in a country that appreciates and understands the sacrifice of their father’s and mother’s. Why do some of the freaks in Hollywood go out of their way to hurt these children? Last summer, I went on a 6,000 mile motorcycle ride in one month to raise funds for the Special Operations Warrior Foundation. I advertised and begged for someone from Hollywood to come forward and help for this worthy cause. Since 1980, they have paid FULL college scholorships for the children of fallen Spec Ops from all branches. Did I hear anything? NO! Funds went to gross donations and parties for Presidential Campaigns instead of the over 700 children who are really wounded. If that was not enough, some actors and actresses went well out of their way to speak out against the war on terror and use their voices to tell the children of these heroes that their parent’s lives were lost in vein. SHAME ON HOLLYWOOD!!
Snowball Express has been in Los Angeles the past three years. If only more good men like Gary Sinese (sp) had stepped up to the plate, perhaps they would not be moving the effort to Texas next year.
Susan Serandin…your movies have been purged from my home. How dare you side with and only get Cindy Sheehan’s side? Ann Coulter….raise the bar. Don’t go on a freak show like “The View” again.
I have been to Iraq. I have visited a greatful nation. I have been in two documentaries for women’s rights in Iraq.
America, you are being fed some terrible propaganda from the media. Do a little research on your own. Less than 300 men do my son’s job worldwide. His job somewhat resembled what our good Gov. of Calif. only portrays in movies. Arnold is an actor. Like most actors, he has no clue what these men do and what they gave their lives for.
Deb Argel-Bastian, Proud mom of Capt. Derek Argel
I sincerely hope that the Republican party doesn’t become the party of Limbaugh and Coulter. If you read exit polling from the last few elections, you’ll see that more people identify themselves as Conservative than Liberal, but far more identify themselves as Moderate or Independent. I agree with the far-Right portion of the media (i.e. Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, Levine) about 40% or 50% of the time at best. If the Republican party goes hard Right, you’ll leave a lot of people like me who don’t have anyone to vote for. Give me Mark Steyn, Jonah Goldberg, or Thad McCotter Republicans, and you can count me in your camp.
I’m also tired of the lie about Palin being a drag on the ticket. Harley, there is absolutely NO data to indicate that she was (other than a few polls that are insubstantial at best). John McCain was behind and losing ground. Obama had the Dem Convention and his big speech (which despite being pretty vanilla, was delivered with his usual excellence). The next day Palin was picked and within a week McCain was in front. He received the second most votes ever for a Republican, despite a lackluster campaign, a bad economy, some huge mistakes on the campaign trail, and a slobbering media that actually had one reporter crying with joy at the results.
If she hadn’t been on the ticket (say he picked Romney or Pawlenty), my guess is he would have lost by at least another 3 or 4 million votes (and more seats would have been lost). She lost considerable ground with her sub-par interviews (actually, painful is probably a better word), but still drew huge crowds, raised a lot of money, and got many in the base excited for the first time since 2004.
[Deb said....Really folks, lets get over it. I lost my son, Capt. Derek Argel on Memorial Day of 2005. So focused on their mission, two on his plane, did not take time to pin their new Captain’s bars on the morning they died. They were Spec Ops Warriors. They were few in numbers, and the best of the best. My son was 28 years old, and was a soldier who served; God, Country and Family. Derek never waisted one moment of life.]
I’m sorry for your loss, but thank you for your son’s service. More than that, thanks for trying to do what’s you believe is right. Sadly, more people will hear about Ms. Sheehan and her efforts, but I’m grateful that you raised such an amazing man.
Deb, I too am sorry for your loss–but also grateful that your son used his life to do so much good. As an Air Force brat (my father retired as a major about ten years ago), I’ve always had a lot of respect for the American military…and I have even more respect for its elite, those like your son who go the extra ten miles. He and his comrades are the reason the words “hero” and “inspiration” were invented.
If there’s a God, I’m sure he’s held your son as a friend and brother these past three years.
Des, why do you say Limbaugh and Coulter are “far right”? Coulter is more a satirist than anything, and I think you’d have a difficult time finding a major differing opinion between Limbaugh and some of the more acceptable conservatives you mentioned.
This is actually another case of acceding to liberal orthodoxy. By admitting that the merely right is the far right, they’ve already tilted the ideological axis in their favor.
Thank you folks. This is a VERY serious issue with me. The best I can do for my son if what he would be doing now. That is to help with the children of the fallen, like his son Logan. Imagine the frustration of trying to reach out to the media to hear our story. I live only 20 minutes from the Santa Ynez Valley where so many of our “Stars” call home. Our effort and pleas have gone out to them on the local news and local papers. They close their eyes to the need and to our views. The same is true in Hollywierd. I am only 60 minutes from Santa Barbara. It is somewhat strange that I get no reply from Oprah, and folks that live there because I don’t agree with their views. If they choose to give their efforts in an anti-American, anti-children of lost heroes…there is not much we can do. I do want America to know how painful this is for us, and most of all the young children who have lost a parent. My Derek’s son Logan, puts his hand on his heart and says, “My Daddy is in my heart. My daddy is a hero.” If the Hollywood crowd will not help these children, can’t they at least keep their mouths shut? Nice that America puts their trust in Oprah. She won’t use her money to help our own, but only an “exclusive” school in Africa. HELLO…Oprah…your “roots” are here. This is the country that made you, and those that died to make it possible.
Deb
… when he surrounded normal cats with cats whose behavior had been bizarrely altered by brain surgery, the normal cats began acting like the crazy cats all around them.
Yeah, and that’s why I’m hanging around all the cool cats @ BH because I want to be a cool cat, too.
And I see the harley-burley is hovering around in its filth and fog tonight … again.
Deb, you need to call Dennis Miller’s show (or email his producer, Christian). He is as big a supporter of the troops as there is (and it’s sincere, as I’ve seen in person), and I’ll bet anything you could get him (or get him to point you to someone) who could be helpful. If nothing else, you could promote the charity on his show (I guarantee he’d be happy to let you tell your story).
Chris, I know Rush isn’t as far to the Right as some, but I would consider him pretty far in that direction (although I don’t know if anyone is as far Right as Ann, and I don’t buy her schtick about being a satirist, unless we’re going to start calling Olberman and Maher one as well). There really is no such thing as a laundry list that makes someone Right, Center-Right, or Far-Right. It’s just a judgment that you make, and the next person might see it differently. I’m one of those “Moderates” Rush makes fun of. The way I see it, someone who views each issue on it’s own merits, instead of giving allegiance to an amorphous philosophy that no one can actually cite chapter and verse on, is the last person someone like Limbaugh should be making fun of.
To each their own. He mocks me, I dismiss him as an opportunist. We’re even.
I think peer pressure is the best analogy I’ve ever heard for the phenomenon we see in the media. It’s like the newscasters want to be part of the “in” crowd and fawn all over the popular kids.. i.e. Hollywood. And it doesn’t stop there. I’ve learned the hard way not to bring up my conservative views in social situations, or even on my blog. There’s this mentality that it’s okay to be horrible to someone who supports a conservative candidate and heaven help you if you fight back– you’ll end up with all kinds of labels, intolerant, racist, stupid. Logic has nothing to do with it. People just want to feel like they’re one of the cool kids. **Sigh** I had hoped I would leave all that behind in high school, but it really never ends.
Deb:
I am glad to hear from you and hope you find love and support here. I am the mother of two sons whom I love so much. And I love your son, too, with the universal love that is too seldom expressed. And I love your son’s son.
We are not going to forget our heroes. Please keep writing.
Go back to 1992 and 1994. Or even 1976 and 1980. The media — both news and entertainment — and the Hollywood celebs might have had a little less religious fervor towards Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton than they did for Barack Obama, but does anyone really think they weren’t still in the tank for the Democrats in ‘80, when Reagan won re-election? Saturday Night Live (in what’s still its Worst Year Ever) made Reagan out to be Nixon to the 3rd power in terms of evilness and craziness and the press was also portraying him as someone who was both an idiot and who would blow up the world five seconds after inauguration.
The Republicans led by Gingrich were given the same treatment in 1994. Didn’t matter then, and it didn’t matter in 1980. Hollywood and the media can sell a new product, like a Jimmy Carter, or a Bill Clinton, or a Barack Obama, to a public tired and/or upset with Republicans. What they couldn’t do then, and won’t be able to do in 2010 or ‘12 if things aren’t going well, is tell them a piece of crap is top sirloin, and they should ask for more helpings on their dinner plate.
If Obama’s successful and people think the country’s headed in the right direction because they see positive indications, than the Republicans are in trouble. But if there’s problems with inflation and/or unemployment, or there’s been a major terror attack due to lowered vigilance or trouble overseas due to foreign policy changes, nothing SNL, or Jon Stewart, or any of the late night comics, Hollywood filmmakers or liberal big media outlets do is going to keep swing voters from pointing the accountability finger at the Democrats, since Republicans have no power in Washington for at least the next two years.
They can try and blame Bush, Cheney, Rush, Hannity, Sarah, Joe the Plumber or anyone else they don’t like, but 21 months from now, its their responsibility for good or bad.
Amen, my brother, Amen. They can’t ever beat us unless we lose the will to win. Palin has what Reagan had — and what we should cultivate — the aura of the Happy Warrior. We must live as though our beliefs and principles improve our characters, lives and personal satisfaction, because if they don’t, then why aren’t we liberals? (who are the crankiest, crabbiest folks ever. Not even winning makes them truly happy, because they fear those of us not in the pod)
Thanks again all. Most of all, thanks to Andrew for putting up this page. I have emailed Dennis Miller to go on the show. I did not get a reply. I have tried to go on Hannity and Colmes…no reply. Rush did a short piece on my situation when I challenged the crosses on the beach in Santa Barbara. Seems that Richard Dryfuss thought someone was going to sneak into his backyard and take his son into the military in the dead of night! Only Cavuto has invited me on about four times. After I returned from Iraq, I heard that John Kerry was going over for photo ops with our troops. He was thinking about running for the big office. This was just after his uneducated and stupid remarks about getting stuck in Iraq if you did not get a proper education. Mr. Cavuto had me on to address this issue. I asked all military and their commanders not to pose with John Kerry. I did receive about 300 email photos of a very lonely Mr. Kerry.
This effort on my part, is to let Hollywood know what they could have done with their voices, and did not do. Since my son’s death, I have focused on other GS families and their needs. Since Hollywood will not give us a voice, part of my efforts will be speaking to High School and College level kids. My focus will be on the acting abilities or lack of, and the need for America to separate roles from real.
Thanks, Deb
(okay, THREE reasons but the other two you couldn’t really make out in the initial headshots…)
Harley, the above statement reveals the sexism of ersatz enlightened liberals. You are a fraud.
The harley-burley hovers in its filth and fog.
Please read this: http://alaskareport.com/news19/x61897_anwr_statement.htm
(especially those who think shes a “bimbo”) So little you know.
Calm down people, its always darkest before the inauguration of the Anti-Christ.
Harley, if you think that no conservative commentators liked Palin, you are just not reading enough. However, to get the real scoop on Palin, you can do little better than read the commentary from the left wing Camille Paglia. One of her most recent comments: “Whatever legitimate objections may be raised to Palin on political grounds … have been lost in the amoral overkill that has defamed a self-made woman of concrete achievement in the public realm.”
Wonderful post Andrew. That is the optimism we need. I’m sick and tired and commentators from all sides of the aisle saying that Palin, and other conservatives, should not defend themselves. Screw that. They are exactly wrong. Let our side fight back with vigor, point out the hypocrisy and idiocy of the MSM.
I need to ask a favor. I am an active duty Marine(13 years) currently serving in Afghanistan, yes, Afghanistan, and I need a favor. I need a country to come home to. I am glad I am missing the Obamania, and the coronation. But I will be comming home soon and I need to know that my home is still there. From what I have been reading on the net, it’s almost gone. The media have accomplished their goal, they have gotten the people to elect their choice for Pressident. In some places that means they controll the country. The election is long over and the press is still going after Palin. You have got to be kidding me. Where I come from we call that OCD. And yes, as a warior I respect the hell out of McCain. But I don’t think he was a good Republican. These days fame is all that counts. It seems that there are either those that are famous and those that want to be famous. For some reason the press sets the standards, they decide the merit of someones character and that’s it. No one seems to try to dig deeper and figure it out on their own. Sad, it is so sad. So please, fight, fight hard to keep my home safe until I get back, once I’m there, I’ll take over. Thanks.
Bravo… Finally someone gives me hope for the future… I’m not sure who reads this blog but it’s seems this man is speaking directly to you… I come from Coulter’s site and you people have no clue what you are talking about when it comes to Sarah Palin. She is an amazing woman, and since the conservative woman have been carrying the banner of freedom and free markets for the GOP for the past 4 years, why the hell would we stop now? You RINO’s can cool it with the Palin talk, middle America loves her, and she stands for what us, conservatives stand for, God, Liberty, and the Constitution, and the Free Market. We don’t want you in the party any longer if you can’t handle one of those subjects.
“The fact remains that with the MSM seizing control, Republicans will never win the Presidency again, imo. Nothing can be done anymore. I used to be a political junkie…listened to Limbaugh every day. I haven’t tuned in since election day. What’s the point?”
Well, I can’t say I haven’t occasionally felt this way since election day. But what you need to understand is that this is a chaotic world and it is impossible to have complete thought control over a country like the US. The propaganda people were willing to believe in 2008, after 8 years of a Republican president and with lackluster Republican nominee, may not work as well in 2012 or 2016, after sufficient experience with Democrat hegemony.
Believe me when I tell you, there are limits to propaganda. Reality is a limit to propaganda. They will mess up sooner or later, and all the namecalling isn’t going to help them.
Meanwhile we need to keep working on the culture. Make the culture conservative. It’s much more important than electing Republicans. It is our buffer. We need good salesmen for the ideas. This site is a good start.
but especially we need to work on it from a non-partisan, non-ideological angle. Corruption isn’t a left/right issue. We need to support institutions which fight corruption and support term limits. We could get term limits for Congress within 10 years if we concentrated our efforts in that direction. They’ll give us plenty of ammo, trust me.
If the problem is the “machine”, don’t worry about politics. Get to work on dismantling “the machine” by all means available. It won’t happen overnight, but it will happen.
The elite media is dying right before our very eyes, even as talk radio holds it own and while the alternative media is here to stay. And you say it's all over? Why? Because the most Liberal Republican in American history lost to a Democrat? Nonsense. It wasn't Rush Limbaugh who lost, it was John McCain. Doesn't that tell you something? Doesn't Prop. 8 tell you something? The elite media's monopoly is dying. They can no longer create the narrative. The American people are no longer atomized. This is as bad as it's going to get, and can only get better. I'm very optimistic.
We need to worry less about politics and politicians. Sell the culture, sell the values and the politicians will emerge. Work against corruption, for term limits, for freedom. It won’t happen overnight. The Tina Feys can’t control chaos, they are not God. They will lose sooner or later.
Go, BigHollywood, Go! Awesome sight.
More and more I keep hearing how we lost with John mccain because he wasn’t conservative. It’s true. Our superstars in the party are those who were closest to conservative values.
Ever notice how politicians on the left (including Hussein Obama( denigrate those on the right, while conservatives rarely do?
Hannity said not too long ago that he was a conservative – not a republican. Do we need a new party?
For a good article that has truth in it that lefties are still blind to:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/01/does_iraq_make_bush_a_failed_p.html
Rock on, Big Hollywood.
Anyone that stands up to what is called ourpress and the mad dog democrats has my vote. Palin will kick butt out there once she has the same run as others. they just put her out there and she held her own with the animals. Now she has four year to create what the mad dogs did for his Lord Messiah Obamus the great
I am an artist (painter-musician) writing from the Land of Israel. An immigrant from Canada, I am quite familiar with the ways of North American and European main-stream media.
The article is also apropos to the situation regarding our conflict with Hamas and Islamo-fascism.
“Peace marchers and Rallies for Peace.”
These are two terms bandied about by the media. These Leftist groups are savvy, they call themselves “Peace Groups” and the media, made up of Einsteins one and all, simply parrot these claims.
What usually happens at these “peaceful” rallies is spirited spitting, the throwing of foot apparel (the latest in our fashionable move to primitivism) and chants of “Death to (either or both) Israel and Amerika!”
Not a terribly peaceful chant, but then the press rarely reports this, and if they do they give a list of the “peace protesters” grievances, and perceptions, while apologizing for their behavior.
Under the heading of perceptions, the Palestinian supporters consider themselves the non-violent, peace loving party in the quarrel.
Many ironies come to light, for example how is it deemed peaceful for a female kaffiyeh covered protester in Ft. Lauderdale to scream “All the Jews should go back to the ovens!” Is this another example of progressive thinking on the part of the protesters?” The Leftist, non-Arab organizer of the rally excused the woman’s calls with,
“this was the chant of a lone protester and not shared by the group as a whole, but one must understand what would lead someone to yell this.”
Of course we should and do. This woman and those who sympathize with her comments are also a pack of racist Fascists, now that was easy.
The Effect of Television on one’s perceptions,
Television has played a major role in the perceptions of their viewers. It is interesting to prowl the multitude of international stations hiding within my remote control. I go from the BBC, which to prove their righteousness and objective stance, report on a minor demonstration in Indonesia against “the BBC’s pro-Zionist reporting.” and there are those who will take it seriously.
As for the government run Syrian Television, they run a loop of bloody film, showing operations going on in Gaza. It could be a gull bladder removal, but who cares, they want blood and blood is what they get, even if it is ketchup.
In the first moments of the war, much of the western press sided with Israel. Remembering that southern Israel, populated by the Working Classes, was daily pounded by rockets from Gaza, yes, even when the so-called “secular” Fatah was in control.
When the latest ceasefire was broken with the firing of 60 rockets into Israel, we went to war. Simply put, enough was enough.
So the press gets all excited, they fly in from all points on the planet, Israeli camera and sound crews are about to employ their staff, as well as take on new staff. The pictures are great! Bombs exploding over Gaza! “Go Get Hamas!” and “do it quickly”.
Why quickly? What we have is an audience that is used to 90 minute action packed movies, big stars, ladies in bikinis, beer commercials and a dose of crying children.
War has become kitsch.
Like the bottle head of Jesse Barfield tucked a way in the trunk of the car, it has over-stayed its welcome. The war became boring, the victory was not total, the audience is going elsewhere.
While hoping for victory, the realities of war begin to sink in. “Oh my I didn’t know war involved so much blood?…oooo that’s gross.” and indeed it is.
“War Crimes!”
This is a favorite among those who consider Israel’s existence an oxymoron in an enlightened age.
Yes war crimes.
Interestingly the list of obvious Palestinian war crimes are forgotten, could this be a case of not ingesting enough Omega B? or is it, dare I say, linked to an agenda.
The simple firing of rockets into Israel, targeting civilians, is a war crime.
The kidnapping and holding of an Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, without allowing the appropriate international bodies, The Red Cross, to verify his conditions and also the minimum to see if he is dead or alive. This is also a war crime.
As for firing rockets and then using their own population as Human Shields, is most definitely a war crime.
But these fade into the gooey nougat gumbo of proportionality and objectivity.
“Peace Activists”. If they really do care about the Palestinians, then they should have filled the streets of London and Paris, for the last eight years, to protest the firing of rockets into Israel, stating that they feared the retaliation of the Nazi Zionist entity. Heck if they really believe that we act like Nazis, then Israel’s retaliation should have been expected and feared, if only for the sake of the children.
“Peace Activists”, that means active proponents of said peace. They are a very active bunch, appearing before the cameras, armed with an absence of knowledge, calling the Zionists; Nazi, brutal, bloodthirsty, colonialists, imperialists, practitioners of apartheid,as well as the ever joyful and illuminating “war mongers”..State Terror etc. All lovely terms brought to you by the Smolensk School of Stalinist Rhetoric.
In closing I am living in a town that is not effected, immediately, by the rocket fire. Yet we are in range of the Hezbollah and their Iranian supplied assortment of instant nightmares. When one awakes in Israel one is faced with the reality, that the news will be reporting a missile fired from the south (Gaza) or a missile fired from the north (Lebanon, another wonderful jewel tarnished by Hate), or the wild Th Caliphate dream poetry of Ahmanidinijad in Iran, or the passing of gas in an opium haze emanating from the stunted shores of Libya.
We are surrounded by sick demented misogynists and child rapers. Israel is their humiliation, and not until we are destroyed will many of them begin to gain back their honor. This will certainly not be enough, they have bigger fish to fry. Amereeka, I’ll have that with Fries and a Coke. Shookran.
Big Hollywood is a step in the right (both meanings) direction. We can all have an impact on the future shape of this experiment we call America. The pendulum has once again swung left, but it's not stuck there. We can take a lesson from the brilliant organization the Liberals have honed over the past two presidential terms – the media, the internet, the education system. We need to do all we can to take these institutions back, or at the very least, be more competitive in them. All is not lost. The fat lady may have been heard warming up in the wings, but she hasn't hit the stage yet.
The greatest threat to this site, and the American people, is the MSM.
Frankly, what I have written previously in the above responses proves that I am one of those crazy acting cats that have adopted the self hating mentality that repetitve liberal media harping has literally deluded me and others with. I also get a truly warm feeling out of my smugness to be able to say Sarah Palin is not qualified. Face it, I’d rather have a plagerizing, passed over for president in the primaries three times Biden than her. Can you imagine how idiotic I sound, prefering a liar and a loser to this accomplished woman? What might you say is the real issue with me and other crazy liberals. (Well, I may not think I am, but go back to the crazy cat theory). Mostly I hate the fact that Sarah has apparently more balls than I do. Most liberal males (IE, ones that sport the anatomy but don’t sport the title “MAN”) are really screeching about her. It is obvious. She has more courage and resolve to do, while I and others like me merely comment on the internet, feel satisfied and smug, then go and sit down to pee. God I hate myself.
Republicans need to stop being so polite and passive. If Republicans want to remain nice and kowtow in order to not rock the boat, well kiss the conservative movement goodbye.
The left beat us at the game. They were better organized. Look how they used the Internet so brilliantly to spread their propaganda. When I wanted to get involved locally, I had a very hard time finding any information regarding local Republican activities. In the Internet age, why is that? What’s wrong with our party’s grassroots efforts?
Maybe we need Obama in office to breathe some life and fight into our party. We need new leaders full of fight; not Washingtonians who care more about being invited to the best cocktail parties or being the mainstream media’s favorite token RINO.
Brian,
Bush and conservative should never be written in the same sentence.
Good editorial and points well taken. Having lived thru the 1964 trouncing of Barry Goldwater by LBJ, I can remember the great malaise felt by the GOP at the time — the Party’s dead, some of them railed.
However, in short order Reagan began his rise and ultimately the GOP took over Congress led by Newt Gingrich. The sad part of this whole thing, and the posters to this opinion piece surely know it, is that the GOP lost its way afterwards. The Contract With America that Newt set forth was a great beginning, but Clinton outmaneuvered the GOP Congress a time or two. And it was if they’d lost the spirit to fight back. A whole attitude of slackness set in, then the love of pork became prominent, then corruption, then big spending — heck, in short order the Party became just another branch of the Democrats. And President Bush, until his last year or two of his Presidency, never seemed to ever find a bill he didn’t like. He should have vetoed McCain-Feingold “campaign reform”, but he thought, I suppose, that the Supreme Court who see it as a violation of the First Amendment right of free speech — they didn’t. He should have vetoed a number of spending bills on the basis of pork, pork, pork, and then sent them back for Congress to inject some hard reality in them. But Bush really is not a conservative as most of the posters before me understand the term. Other than his tax cuts and the Supreme Court appointments, his conservative achievements are few.
As for McCain, I have never seen a worse run, most lackluster campaign for President since Bob Dole. I have heard it from the MSM over and over again that McCain was the best candidate the GOP could have put up in this anti-GOP year. Perhaps…but I think most GOP members would have felt a lot more comfortable nominating a candidate with some real conservative principles, views that were the heart of the candidate. I always felt that with McCain he was a liberal-moderate Christmas tree with conservative garlands and ornaments dangling from it. He just doesn’t seem to have any real tough conservative positions about much of anything except, perhaps, his support of the war.
As you might gather I don’t think much of McCain — never have and doubt I ever will. I voted for him in the election — and only decided to do so on Election Day because my wife and I looked at each other and asked what if Obama wins? Well, Obama won. I really wanted to vote for Bob Barr, even knowing that he could not win. At least it would have been a vote of principle and conscience, not a lesser of two weasels vote, which it turned out to be. Poeple said if you vote for Barr you’re throwing your vote away. Well, folks, I voted for McCain and I felt I threw my vote away.
In retrospect I wish Newt Gingrich had run in 2008. The GOP might still have lost, but the debates would have been very interesting. Newt is a great idea man, very articulate, and he can sell his ideas. And unlike McCain, he is a true conservative. McCain is none of those things, and the slick talking empty suit that is Obama just blew him away and fairly so.
Take heart — 2010 is less than 2 years away, and I suspect that President “O” will not be having such a swell time, the bloom will be off the rose, and buyer’s remorse will have sunk in among the electorate. While the Congress may not swing back to GOP control, I think it will be less Democratic. But please, GOP, go back to your basic tenets — scrap this “maverick” stuff and get a backbone. And learn to exploit the internet like Obama did this time — public campaign financing is a joke and always has been.
Living in small military towns, including in the Northwest, and also in the South, I got to know a lot of sharp women who routinely dropped their “G’s,” and spoke with regional accents, something that grates on the refined ears of the glitteratti and chattering classes back east.
They equate such regional accents and pronunciations with ignorance because such people are not like them. Does growing up absorbing such language patterns somehow disqualify one from having a first-rate mind?
They make the mistake of believing those of us who cling to guns and religion will not take notice of the fact that they are arrogantly oblivious to how deeply they insult us and how they seem to think we are unsophisticated and uncritical consumers of their views.
When the MSM trashed two kids who made an all too common juvenile mistake, getting pregnant out of wedlock, many of us wondered why that was such a fatal disqualification. When so many ultra-liberal entertainment industry types couple themselves into parenthood outside wedlock, and are then not only celebrated in industry rags, but also the MSM, we wonder why the example of Palin’s child and her boyfriend is so bad for the country when the libs’ entertainment industry’s unwed parent darlings’ example, far more influential with young audiences, is not.
I think it was Charles Krauthammer who noted that Palin was mishandled and began to shine only when she discarded advice from her handlers and began to listen to her own common sense. He also noted that she was unschooled in some of the basics of the history of policy and law, as evidenced by Katie Couric’s heavily edited ambush. He went on to say that given a couple of years of study in such important subjects, she would be formidable in future elections.
Krauthammer tends to be pretty accurate in such observations. I’m eagerly awaiting the re-introduction of the new Palin when she judges that the time is right.
When that happens, I hope very much that the liberal MSM stampedes after her again with their same preconceived notions and finds themselves caught flat-footed as she shows them for what they are – dishonest brokers of information committing journalism’s seven deadly sins.
Two questions from an independent/swing voter:
1. Is any conservative journalist who speaks out against Palin a traitor or turncoat (or is it more a matter of timing – speaking out during the election as opposed to afterwards)?
2. Re: Ms. Coulter – while she’s obviously good at what she does, wouldn’t some people agree she repels more people than she attracts? I know she mostly preaches to the choir (as does Bill Maher, etc.), but I’m reminded of that old cliche “you can attract more flies with honey than with vinegar.” But that’s just me. As for Rush, I don’t listen to him but again, I’ll be the first to admit he’s good at what he does.
Dave S., I understand your frustration, believe me, and I realize all too well McCain was not a great candidate. But you could show a LITTLE more respect for a man who, after all, did show more courage than most of us will ever have to muster, and endure more pain than many of us have ever faced, in the service of his country. At the very least, you could dispense with “geezer.”
Obi-Wan, bless you and thank you for your service. We’ll do our best to give you a country to come home to.
Libertarian/Conservative, I’m sorry, but if you think a man who served his wife with divorce papers in the recovery room was or is going to make it as a candidate for president, you’re dreaming. Ain’t gonna happen. Ever.
Noonan,
And Krauthammer was originally skeptical of Palin. (As someone should)
“Living in small military towns, including in the Northwest, and also in the South, I got to know a lot of sharp women who routinely dropped their “G’s,” and spoke with regional accents, something that grates on the refined ears of the glitteratti and chattering classes back east.
They equate such regional accents and pronunciations with ignorance because such people are not like them. Does growing up absorbing such language patterns somehow disqualify one from having a first-rate mind?”
As Jeff Foxworthy said, they are going to be surprised when St. Peter says “Ya’ll all pile in the truck, we goin’ up to the big house.”
On an intersting note, people thought similarly of Abraham Lincoln. Even Seward thought Abe was just an illiterate country rube. Now, he is considered one of the smartest men to ever hold office. Not to mention this “illiterate country rube” wrote his own speeches, many of which are considered the finest in American history (Including the Gettysburg Address, which I think is the finest speech in American history).
Republicans need to stop being so polite and passive. If Republicans want to remain nice and kowtow in order to not rock the boat, well kiss the conservative movement goodbye.
The left beat us at the game. They were better organized. Look how they used the Internet so brilliantly to spread their propaganda. When I wanted to get involved locally, I had a very hard time finding any information regarding local Republican activities. In the Internet age, why is that? What’s wrong with our party’s grassroots efforts?
Maybe we need Obama in office to breathe some life and fight into our party. We need new leaders full of fight; not Washingtonians who care more about being invited to the best cocktail parties or being the mainstream media’s favorite token RINO
I think things will change after we are attacked again.
First, THANK YOU DEB for your son and his supreme sacrifice. You and your family are what makes America better than great.
After reading through this impressive thread, I find J.B.’s comments at the heart of it all. Everything comes down to the message fed through our cultural expressions. Conservative language and themes have been pushed to the side for the progressive message of self first, immediate gratification and the false sense of acceptance (selective ideas is not acceptance). One need only look at the benign sitcoms of the early sixties to see the first hints of the progressive message being fed us. My Three Sons, Andy Griffith, Family Affair, The Courtship of Eddie’s Father and a host of others featured homes where the mother died and yet the father was more than capable to run a household happily without her. Sure, Andy had Aunt Bea but in more cases than not Aunt Bea caused more problems than she solved leaving Andy to clean up her mess. The women that successfully survived in sitcoms with a family were those that divorced their husbands and were finally liberated, ie, One Day At A Time, Alice or were widowed and seemed to blossom with this gift of single motherhood, The Ghost and Mrs. Muir, The Partridge Family. Traditional family units were boring and held little marketable material for storylines. Perhaps initially the entertainment industry chose these unique scenarios as a gimick to get eyeballs for the sponsors but eventually the real power of the controlling the message became clear.
For years the entertainment industry has been projecting on the public what THEY are rather than reflecting what the public really is. Slowly, like the crazy cat theory noted, many of us became what the projection on us was. Though they’d want us to believe “most Americans” agree with the characterizations fed them on tv and movies, the truth is, most of us are not slaves yet. In a generation or two though we will be Europe. Oui, Oui, Ya, VERDAD, Ciao, Bella. A majority of those folks are on the “take care of me, tell me what to think, I want to be hip, do I look good?” train.
Time for conservative messages to project back on Hollywood. Instead of money funding political campaigns, conservatives need to back art that projects conservative themes. J.B. has it right, take back the message of the culture and the politicians will rise up on their own. If a positivie conservative archetype exists firmly in our culture’s story, the reality of supporting those views become viable. Even Bin Laden has figured this out. Wake up and step up rich conservatives. Fund the “right” creative projects. An army of creative conservatives will do their part, no doubt.
These views, while instructional to some, don’t represent conservatives everywhere. I try and I try and I can’t support Sarah Palin as a national leader. I’m not brainwashed. I just think she is consistently incoherenet and intellectually slow. God bless her leadership in Alaska and her pro-life position, but let’s get real.
As far as “cultural para-stimuli”, FOX and others are asleep at the wheel. Where is the outrage against the Harvard MBAs who f**ed up the banks, the stock exchange and DC? Where is the outrage against the purge of US manufacturing due to NAFTA, Asia-philia and anti-labor hysteria? Where is the outrage over the Obama picks – tax cheats, pay-to-play pardoners, and socialists? Where’s the outrage over gays in the military and closing GITMO?
There’s plenty of MSM brainwashing going on while sappy conservatives “give the new president a chance.” Meanwhile, the rest of you are running around looking for Barack’s birth certifcate and rehearsing softballs with Sarah Pallin.
The GOP better relearn the basics – small government, economic security, devasting military might and a will to use it. We used to have the hearts and minds.
Fair questions, ScottDS and I’ll try to answer them:
1) Timing does play a part. You don’t attack your own during a campaign–it’s like turning on your allies in the middle of a battle. There’s no way I could ever trust the word of any of the “conservative” commentators who attacked Palin DURING the campaign. As for afterwards, it depends on whether they are criticizing or attacking. There is ALWAYS room for improvement and Sarah Palin, like all the rest of us, is a human being and possesses flaws. If the commentator points towards some legitimate weaknesses that she needs to address–and even more importantly–offers some constructive criticism in HOW to address those weaknesses, then I think that person should be listened to, and the advice, if sound, followed. But, if it’s personal attacks or repeating smears, or some of the other garbage we’ve seen spewed, then as far as I’m concerned, that commentator does not deserve the label “conservative”–they’re a Leftist wolf or, at best, an opportunistic wolf, in conservative dress.
2) If you’ll read some American history, you’ll find that Samuel Adams was also very much a detested figure by many Americans–not to mention the British–as was his relative John. Like Samuel, Ann does fulfill a role–you need ‘rabblerousers’ and ‘bomb-throwers’ to make a revolution work–and make no mistake–it is we conservatives who are now the revolutionaries seeking change–and she actually is effective in getting the message out over the efforts of the Left to silence or denigrate her. Sometimes hearts and flowers–or honey–works best; but sometimes you’ve got to break out the sledgehammer to get results–and it can be difficult at times to determine which approach works best when, and I’ll readily concede that sometimes Ann gets her timing wrong. Rush is someone you HAVE to listen to on a regular basis to fully grasp where he’s coming from, but once you do, you’ll see that–again while not always right–he brings in some very salient and important points that all too many people overlook.
Hope I addressed your concerns in a manner that proves helpful to you.
Several people up the board have mentioned(and it’s hardly an original point) that very very few people who voted Republican in the last election did so because of McCain. Most people I know who voted Republican did so because of Palin, or were merely voting against Obama. And yet it was still undecided going into election day. If nothing else, that tells me that conservative ideals still have a strong foothold in this country. Americans love freedom, they love having their independence, and they hate having the government, or anyone else, tell them how to live their lives. If the Republican party can come up with an actual, real-life small-government, anti-corruption, cut-spending, lower taxes Republican, then they will win in a landslide. Otherwise, the Republican brand will just continue to be diluted by a steady stream of RINOs and “mavericks” and compromisers and compassionate conservatives. Ugh.
Oh, and loved this:
M. Bouffant – January 14th, 2009 at 8:36 pm
Oh, people, please.
Is this what conservatism is revealed as?
Love the term “Islamo-fascist bacteria”.
Palin’s colorful criticism of Couric is enough for me to get excited about voting for her in four years.
A portrayal of alleged enemies as “bacteria,”…
“Alleged enemies”?! This isn’t a courtroom, or a classroom, or a newsroom. This is the rest of America, where we don’t have to couch the truth in uber-PC legal jargon out of fear of getting sued or kicked out of the faculty lounge. Radical Islamists are the enemy. Pure and simple. They’ve declared war on us more times than can be counted. There’s nothing alleged about it.
Really M. Bouffant – “alleged enemies?” Two missing skyscrapers, blasted subway & commuter trains, murdered children at their first day of school, tourists murdered at hotels & nightclubs and you have the temerity to use the term “alleged” to described them?
Having eyes, see ye not? And having ears, hear ye not? And do ye not remember? ~ Mark 8:18
You must be logged in to post a comment.