<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hooray For Big Hollywood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aklavan/2009/01/06/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aklavan/2009/01/06/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:11:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mary G</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aklavan/2009/01/06/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/comment-page-3/#comment-43361</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/aklavan/2008/12/29/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/#comment-43361</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Mr. Klavan.
As a long-time actress (about 55 years, now) with a very modest gift, I am saddened that films/theatre have gone so far into disrespect for human life in general, and American virtues in particular.
Those of us who fled the brutality of the big city streets (and plays and film), salute your courage in remaining. 

Words have power, and yours are, very.

Isn&#039;t it fun to see the conversation you started?
(It&#039;s working. . . .) ;&gt;}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Mr. Klavan.<br />
As a long-time actress (about 55 years, now) with a very modest gift, I am saddened that films/theatre have gone so far into disrespect for human life in general, and American virtues in particular.<br />
Those of us who fled the brutality of the big city streets (and plays and film), salute your courage in remaining. </p>
<p>Words have power, and yours are, very.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it fun to see the conversation you started?<br />
(It&#8217;s working. . . .) ;&gt;}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Hollywood &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big Thanks: A Really Big Launch, A Really Big Tent, A Really Big Future</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aklavan/2009/01/06/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/comment-page-3/#comment-26813</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Hollywood &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big Thanks: A Really Big Launch, A Really Big Tent, A Really Big Future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/aklavan/2008/12/29/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/#comment-26813</guid>
		<description>[...] territory.&#8221; Accomplished conservative screenwriters Robert J. Avrech, Michael McGruther and Andrew Klavan (thanks for kicking things off, Drew) set high writing standards for Big Hollywood on week one. And [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] territory.&#8221; Accomplished conservative screenwriters Robert J. Avrech, Michael McGruther and Andrew Klavan (thanks for kicking things off, Drew) set high writing standards for Big Hollywood on week one. And [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aklavan/2009/01/06/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/comment-page-3/#comment-7993</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/aklavan/2008/12/29/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/#comment-7993</guid>
		<description>Oh ya mean some people are... &quot;Good for Goodness Sake&quot;... An atheist group put that on a bus banner and O&#039;Reilly burst an artery. You can&#039;t reason that way with the Christian right.  Mono- Theism, get it?  One God- their God.  One way- their way.  Sad. &#039;eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh ya mean some people are&#8230; &#8220;Good for Goodness Sake&#8221;&#8230; An atheist group put that on a bus banner and O&#8217;Reilly burst an artery. You can&#8217;t reason that way with the Christian right.  Mono- Theism, get it?  One God- their God.  One way- their way.  Sad. &#8216;eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Perren</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aklavan/2009/01/06/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/comment-page-3/#comment-7953</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Perren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/aklavan/2008/12/29/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/#comment-7953</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s possible to agree with many conservative values and goals - and in significant ways its political philosophy - while disagreeing that they rest on Christianity. Religion, all religion and Christianity in particular, are often opposed to self-assertion, self-reliance, individualism, individual liberty, respect for property rights, and more.

One need not be a Christian, or embrace any religion at all, to 
uphold the worthiness of leading a moral life. Beware false alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s possible to agree with many conservative values and goals &#8211; and in significant ways its political philosophy &#8211; while disagreeing that they rest on Christianity. Religion, all religion and Christianity in particular, are often opposed to self-assertion, self-reliance, individualism, individual liberty, respect for property rights, and more.</p>
<p>One need not be a Christian, or embrace any religion at all, to<br />
uphold the worthiness of leading a moral life. Beware false alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aklavan/2009/01/06/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/comment-page-3/#comment-7729</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/aklavan/2008/12/29/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/#comment-7729</guid>
		<description>Wow...  I guess I&#039;m alone here at Big Hollywood(Jake doesn&#039;t count). But once O&#039;Reilly gives it the big push tomorrow, there will be more like me, I suspect.
I suppose that anyone can read anything into a movie, if they really want to, but come on... this post is a bit of a stretch.  NCFOM?  Are you kidding?  No matter how you try to twist and turn it, the Coen Bros, Tommy Lee Jones and Josh Brolin have not joined forces to push a conservative agenda.  It was a good story, with a great director and excellent actors.  It was not a right wing morality tale!

There is a built in audience for movies like Fireproof.  The churches push it; O&#039;Reilly gives Kirk 5 minutes to plug it, and it makes it&#039;s huge return .  I see no reason the religious right shouldn&#039;t make movies for their base, and it&#039;s base is big.  But as someone that loves quality, thought provoking movies that push the limits and inspire conversation, it&#039;s not what I want see. 
Artists (in general) tend to lean left and no matter how many Big Hollywood sites come up, they always will.  Reading right wing subtext into movies so that you can feel okay about liking them is self delusion.
I am a liberal.  I know that Bob Hope and Bing Crosby were not.  That doesn&#039;t make me love the Road Pictures any less.   I don&#039;t pretend there was a hidden leftist agenda attached to them.  I just enjoy them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;  I guess I&#8217;m alone here at Big Hollywood(Jake doesn&#8217;t count). But once O&#8217;Reilly gives it the big push tomorrow, there will be more like me, I suspect.<br />
I suppose that anyone can read anything into a movie, if they really want to, but come on&#8230; this post is a bit of a stretch.  NCFOM?  Are you kidding?  No matter how you try to twist and turn it, the Coen Bros, Tommy Lee Jones and Josh Brolin have not joined forces to push a conservative agenda.  It was a good story, with a great director and excellent actors.  It was not a right wing morality tale!</p>
<p>There is a built in audience for movies like Fireproof.  The churches push it; O&#8217;Reilly gives Kirk 5 minutes to plug it, and it makes it&#8217;s huge return .  I see no reason the religious right shouldn&#8217;t make movies for their base, and it&#8217;s base is big.  But as someone that loves quality, thought provoking movies that push the limits and inspire conversation, it&#8217;s not what I want see.<br />
Artists (in general) tend to lean left and no matter how many Big Hollywood sites come up, they always will.  Reading right wing subtext into movies so that you can feel okay about liking them is self delusion.<br />
I am a liberal.  I know that Bob Hope and Bing Crosby were not.  That doesn&#8217;t make me love the Road Pictures any less.   I don&#8217;t pretend there was a hidden leftist agenda attached to them.  I just enjoy them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RalphFurley</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aklavan/2009/01/06/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/comment-page-2/#comment-7429</link>
		<dc:creator>RalphFurley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/aklavan/2008/12/29/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/#comment-7429</guid>
		<description>Re: The Dark Knight. I love how EW reviewers writhe that film is &quot;anti-iraq war&quot; etc. I think it&#039;s pro BUSH/USA theme is the reason behind it&#039;s lack of nominations from GG and SAG Awards.

Batman= BUSH/USA
Dent= leftist/European/intelligentsia
Joker= Islamist

The Ferry scene: The Islamists cannot force Americans to act as they do.

Lucius Fox/Cell Phone Machine: Yes, Fox is appalled. It does have potential for great abuse. But Fox&#039;s faith in Batman is justified when the machine self destructs. Batman told him the password; he never said it will blow up. Fox realizes that Batman had never planned to abuse this device. It was a worst case scenario tool. ( hello waterboarders).

Gordon&#039;s final speech: leftist talk a good game, but in the end they need USA to do &quot;dirty work&quot; to protect the world.

very little &quot;iraq&quot; stuff in there. Now dont get me started on how Forrest Gump is pro conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: The Dark Knight. I love how EW reviewers writhe that film is &#8220;anti-iraq war&#8221; etc. I think it&#8217;s pro BUSH/USA theme is the reason behind it&#8217;s lack of nominations from GG and SAG Awards.</p>
<p>Batman= BUSH/USA<br />
Dent= leftist/European/intelligentsia<br />
Joker= Islamist</p>
<p>The Ferry scene: The Islamists cannot force Americans to act as they do.</p>
<p>Lucius Fox/Cell Phone Machine: Yes, Fox is appalled. It does have potential for great abuse. But Fox&#8217;s faith in Batman is justified when the machine self destructs. Batman told him the password; he never said it will blow up. Fox realizes that Batman had never planned to abuse this device. It was a worst case scenario tool. ( hello waterboarders).</p>
<p>Gordon&#8217;s final speech: leftist talk a good game, but in the end they need USA to do &#8220;dirty work&#8221; to protect the world.</p>
<p>very little &#8220;iraq&#8221; stuff in there. Now dont get me started on how Forrest Gump is pro conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Hollywood</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aklavan/2009/01/06/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/comment-page-2/#comment-6401</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Hollywood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/aklavan/2008/12/29/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/#comment-6401</guid>
		<description>[...] in Hollywood isn&#8217;t dead, but it is forced to hide behind superhero costumes and worlds of fantasy.  But that&#8217;s not nothing.  Spider-Man still outsells anti-war flicks any day of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Hollywood isn&#8217;t dead, but it is forced to hide behind superhero costumes and worlds of fantasy.  But that&#8217;s not nothing.  Spider-Man still outsells anti-war flicks any day of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BART</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aklavan/2009/01/06/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/comment-page-2/#comment-6285</link>
		<dc:creator>BART</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/aklavan/2008/12/29/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/#comment-6285</guid>
		<description>JB -- please actually read my post.  You quote only HALF of what I said about conservativism and liberalism.  Sorry, the whole thesis of your argument is &quot;musheaded&quot; and completely disingenuious.  

I&#039;m glad you are 100% conservative and see everything from that slant.  I find it a bit hard to believe but maybe you are that one-dimensional.  I don&#039;t know you.  But good luck and God bless.

And USS Ben, I can&#039;t see why you&#039;re arguing with me.  I agree, it was the point I originally had.  I was simply saying that all that constitutes conservative isn&#039;t right and all that constitues liberal isn&#039;t wrong.  And vice versa, depending on your political and social leanings.  Thanks for the history lesson that there is right and wrong, evil and good in the world and in politics.  Wow, I certainly would have never known that without your anaylsis.  Point I was making is that good doesn&#039;t solely belong to one group or bad to the other -- in terms of conservative and liberal.  I understand the evils of Communism...but how does that equate to liberalism?  Or maybe you were equating that to conservativism, I&#039;m not really sure what you were trying to say there except communism is bad.  Which I agree with.  but it had nothing to do with what I was writing about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JB &#8212; please actually read my post.  You quote only HALF of what I said about conservativism and liberalism.  Sorry, the whole thesis of your argument is &#8220;musheaded&#8221; and completely disingenuious.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you are 100% conservative and see everything from that slant.  I find it a bit hard to believe but maybe you are that one-dimensional.  I don&#8217;t know you.  But good luck and God bless.</p>
<p>And USS Ben, I can&#8217;t see why you&#8217;re arguing with me.  I agree, it was the point I originally had.  I was simply saying that all that constitutes conservative isn&#8217;t right and all that constitues liberal isn&#8217;t wrong.  And vice versa, depending on your political and social leanings.  Thanks for the history lesson that there is right and wrong, evil and good in the world and in politics.  Wow, I certainly would have never known that without your anaylsis.  Point I was making is that good doesn&#8217;t solely belong to one group or bad to the other &#8212; in terms of conservative and liberal.  I understand the evils of Communism&#8230;but how does that equate to liberalism?  Or maybe you were equating that to conservativism, I&#8217;m not really sure what you were trying to say there except communism is bad.  Which I agree with.  but it had nothing to do with what I was writing about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Roberts</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aklavan/2009/01/06/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/comment-page-2/#comment-6157</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/aklavan/2008/12/29/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/#comment-6157</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure The Dark Knight was pro-GWOT, but I definitely believe it is a conservative film about the use of power to combat evil.

In the scene where Batman is &quot;questioning&quot; the Joker, Batman says he has one rule, which the Joker says, &quot;That&#039;s the rule you&#039;ll have to break.&quot;  Presumably, that rule is &quot;thou shalt not kill&quot; because Batman had a chance to kill the Joker earlier and didn&#039;t.  Instead, Batman worked a plan to have the Joker captured by the police and await trial.  But when the Joker escapes from jail, Batman finds the Joker by utilizing a sonar device that most liberals believe President Bush has the NSA working on right now.  Batman&#039;s confidant Mr. Fox, in the worst display of self-righteousness and moral equivocation, proclaims that spying on 30 million people is wrong despite the Joker&#039;s threat to blow up a couple of passenger-loaded ferries.  But, thanks to Batman&#039;s forethought, he has the device programmed to self-destruct at Mr. Fox&#039;s instruction when the ordeal is over.

So, truly, Batman&#039;s one rule is to not appropriate for himself more power than is necessary to combat evil.  Where Batman could become a Ceasar of Gotham, he instead chooses to be a Cincinnatus.  The movie&#039;s tagline, &quot;You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain&quot; is, I think, a sympathetic recognition of the difficulties our government has to carry out its law enforcement and national defense missions while not running afoul of our constitutional (some would say natural) rights.

Where Christopher Nolan comes down on issues of domestic surveillance and warantless wiretaps is anyone&#039;s guess.  And that&#039;s why this film is excellent --it asserts an absolute moral abstract and then shows that the application is much more nuanced than either liberals or conservatives would like it to be.

And lest anyone think that The Dark Knight only criticizes the government, the scene with the civilians on the ferry is a biting commentary on the cowardice and selfishness of those who adhere to moral relativism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure The Dark Knight was pro-GWOT, but I definitely believe it is a conservative film about the use of power to combat evil.</p>
<p>In the scene where Batman is &#8220;questioning&#8221; the Joker, Batman says he has one rule, which the Joker says, &#8220;That&#8217;s the rule you&#8217;ll have to break.&#8221;  Presumably, that rule is &#8220;thou shalt not kill&#8221; because Batman had a chance to kill the Joker earlier and didn&#8217;t.  Instead, Batman worked a plan to have the Joker captured by the police and await trial.  But when the Joker escapes from jail, Batman finds the Joker by utilizing a sonar device that most liberals believe President Bush has the NSA working on right now.  Batman&#8217;s confidant Mr. Fox, in the worst display of self-righteousness and moral equivocation, proclaims that spying on 30 million people is wrong despite the Joker&#8217;s threat to blow up a couple of passenger-loaded ferries.  But, thanks to Batman&#8217;s forethought, he has the device programmed to self-destruct at Mr. Fox&#8217;s instruction when the ordeal is over.</p>
<p>So, truly, Batman&#8217;s one rule is to not appropriate for himself more power than is necessary to combat evil.  Where Batman could become a Ceasar of Gotham, he instead chooses to be a Cincinnatus.  The movie&#8217;s tagline, &#8220;You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain&#8221; is, I think, a sympathetic recognition of the difficulties our government has to carry out its law enforcement and national defense missions while not running afoul of our constitutional (some would say natural) rights.</p>
<p>Where Christopher Nolan comes down on issues of domestic surveillance and warantless wiretaps is anyone&#8217;s guess.  And that&#8217;s why this film is excellent &#8211;it asserts an absolute moral abstract and then shows that the application is much more nuanced than either liberals or conservatives would like it to be.</p>
<p>And lest anyone think that The Dark Knight only criticizes the government, the scene with the civilians on the ferry is a biting commentary on the cowardice and selfishness of those who adhere to moral relativism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jannb8</title>
		<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/aklavan/2009/01/06/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/comment-page-2/#comment-5809</link>
		<dc:creator>Jannb8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/aklavan/2008/12/29/hooray-for-big-hollywood-1/#comment-5809</guid>
		<description>Your commentary gives me shivers, Mr. Klavan . . .  the good kind!

Thank you for focusing your SLR lens on what Hollywood needs to do . . . 
Standards . . .
Leadership . . .
Responsibility . . . 

Great conservative leaders have emerged from the film industry and can inspire and lead us again.
Mind games do not have to be an exclusive tool of the liberals . . . conservatives can be persuasive, too.  Would more &quot;Courage&quot; improve the focus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your commentary gives me shivers, Mr. Klavan . . .  the good kind!</p>
<p>Thank you for focusing your SLR lens on what Hollywood needs to do . . .<br />
Standards . . .<br />
Leadership . . .<br />
Responsibility . . . </p>
<p>Great conservative leaders have emerged from the film industry and can inspire and lead us again.<br />
Mind games do not have to be an exclusive tool of the liberals . . . conservatives can be persuasive, too.  Would more &#8220;Courage&#8221; improve the focus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
